Source: dpkg
Source-Version: 1.17.11
Severity: serious
Hi!
Ok so it's failing to build on all non-Linux ports. I've a fix queued
locally, which I'll be pushing tomorrow in case there's anything else
to fix.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#7330: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #7330,
regarding dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides fileutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#747264: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #747264,
regarding [dpkg] Please clarify the manual page regarding --verify /
--verify-format options
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751021: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #751021,
regarding dpkg: File descriptor 6 (/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp) leaked on
vgs invocation.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#7330: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #7330,
regarding dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#755166: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #755166,
regarding dpkg-source --include-removal: cannot represent change to
../../../../../../dev/null: binary file contents changed
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756209: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #756209,
regarding [dpkg] Hint headers turned half useless by the Spanish translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#754127: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #754127,
regarding [INTL:da] Danish translation of dpkg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751363: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #751363,
regarding dpkg: change gnu-triplet for i386 to i586-linux-gnu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.10
Severity: wishlist
Idea:
Plain
$ dpkg --verify #with no arguments
is great to find all the problems on the system.
However then one needs dlocate etc. to find out the package
which the problem files belong to.
So there should be a way to get it to tell us at the sam
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756230: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #756230,
regarding dpkg-shlibdeps: Improve the error message when the lib is not shipped
in a package
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756526: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #756526,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-source -x can fail if SIGPIPE is ignored
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#7330: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #7330,
regarding magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752036: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #752036,
regarding [PATCH] Replace with
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756975: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #756975,
regarding dpkg-genchanges option to only include arch:all debs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#563307: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #563307,
regarding dpkg-statoverride and non-existing groups
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751032: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #751032,
regarding Please enable -fstack-protector on arm64 now that toolchain supports
it
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#757254: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #757254,
regarding "dpkg --add-architecture" silently ignores extra arguments
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756920: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #756920,
regarding dpkg: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for program
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#112131: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #112131,
regarding dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#134582: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #134582,
regarding dpkg: support versioned Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#180316: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #180316,
regarding dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides fileutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#24934: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #24934,
regarding magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#7330: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #7330,
regarding dpkg: support versioned Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#112131: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #112131,
regarding please support handling Provides: with specific version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#563307: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #563307,
regarding dpkg-statoverride --remove fails if group no longer exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#563307: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #563307,
regarding pkg-statoverride should not consider unknown group a "syntax error"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#24934: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #24934,
regarding please support handling Provides: with specific version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#134582: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #134582,
regarding dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#112131: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #112131,
regarding magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#134582: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #134582,
regarding dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides fileutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#180316: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #180316,
regarding please support handling Provides: with specific version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#24934: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #24934,
regarding dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#7330: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #7330,
regarding please support handling Provides: with specific version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#24934: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #24934,
regarding dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides fileutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#563307: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #563307,
regarding dpkg-statoverride fails if wrong group in /var/lib/dpkg/statoverride
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#180316: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #180316,
regarding dpkg: support versioned Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#112131: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #112131,
regarding dpkg: won't remove fileutils even though coreutils provides fileutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#24934: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #24934,
regarding dpkg: support versioned Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#134582: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #134582,
regarding please support handling Provides: with specific version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#134582: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #134582,
regarding magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#180316: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #180316,
regarding dpkg: [wish] Providing a specific version of another package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#180316: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #180316,
regarding magicfilter and gs-aladdin -- need versioned provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#112131: fixed in dpkg 1.17.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #112131,
regarding dpkg: support versioned Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 754127 pending
Bug #754127 [dpkg] [INTL:da] Danish translation of dpkg
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
754127: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754127
Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 757254 pending
Bug #757254 [dpkg] "dpkg --add-architecture" silently ignores extra arguments
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
757254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 756975 pending
Bug #756975 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-genchanges option to only include arch:all debs
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 747264 pending
Bug #747264 [dpkg] [dpkg] Please clarify the manual page regarding --verify /
--verify-format options
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
747264: http://bugs.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 751363 pending
Bug #751363 [dpkg] dpkg: change gnu-triplet for i386 to i586-linux-gnu
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 756209 pending
Bug #756209 [dpkg] [dpkg] Hint headers turned half useless by the Spanish
translation
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 751021 pending
Bug #751021 [dpkg] dpkg: File descriptor 6 (/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp)
leaked on vgs invocation.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751021: http://bugs.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 756920 pending
Bug #756920 [dpkg] dpkg: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for program
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 563307 pending
Bug #563307 [dpkg] dpkg-statoverride fails if wrong group in
/var/lib/dpkg/statoverride
Bug #592764 [dpkg] pkg-statoverride should not consider unknown group a "syntax
error"
Bug #683971 [dpkg] dpkg-statoverride --remove fails
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 756526 pending
Bug #756526 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: dpkg-source -x can fail if SIGPIPE is ignored
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 751032 pending
Bug #751032 [dpkg] Please enable -fstack-protector on arm64 now that toolchain
supports it
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751032: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 755166 pending
Bug #755166 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-source --include-removal: cannot represent change
to ../../../../../../dev/null: binary file contents changed
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 756230 pending
Bug #756230 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-shlibdeps: Improve the error message when the lib
is not shipped in a package
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
756230: http://bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 752036 pending
Bug #752036 [dpkg] [PATCH] Replace with
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
752036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752036
Debian Bug Trackin
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 00:06:29 +0200
with message-id <20140809220629.ga22...@gaara.hadrons.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#268200: debsig-verify: allow dpkg-sig to be used for
verification
has caused the Debian Bug report #268200,
regarding debsig-verify: allow dpkg-sig to be used for
Guillem Jover wrote:
> But, this has a nice side-effect, you can also do something like:
>
> $ dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-g
>
> which will perform a normal full build, but filter the generated
> .changes file to only include source+arch-indep packages. Which I
> think is what you'd be
Hi!
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:39:54 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.17.10
> Severity: minor
>
> This is what happens when you add a debian/* file to a quilt patch (which is
> apparently something newcomers sometimes do...) and then try to build the
> source package:
> pa
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Funnily this can already be done with “dpkg-buildpackage
> --changes-option=-S” but it will generate a _.changes file
> that list only the source package (that's because the filename
> is decided by dpkg-buildpackage while the content comes from
> dpkg-genchanges).
Hmm, so
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.17.10
Severity: minor
This is what happens when you add a debian/* file to a quilt patch
(which is apparently something newcomers sometimes do...) and then try
to build the source package:
patching file debian/rules
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!
Hi!
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 12:00:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hmm, I had already pondered about this when I saw the announcement. So,
> > while I agree such option would make life easier for people that want
> > to do “almost-source-only uploads” right now (because TBH the
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Joey Hess wrote:
> An added wrinkle is that -S doesn't build arch specific debs at all, of
> course, but a responsible user of this new DAK feature will want to
> build debs, lintian and test the locally, but not upload them.
>
> I think this calls for more than a generic
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hmm, I had already pondered about this when I saw the announcement. So,
> while I agree such option would make life easier for people that want
> to do “almost-source-only uploads” right now (because TBH the other
> alternatives are very annoying), on first thought this seeme
66 matches
Mail list logo
