Bug#819194: dpkg-buildflags: please add normalizedebugpath to reproducible feature set

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:36:00PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > This isn't fun-spoiling, it's a useful reality check. But if we were > required to get all the way to 100% before we made any progress, then > reproducible builds wouldn't have gotten off the ground at all. it's surely

Bug#819194: dpkg-buildflags: please add normalizedebugpath to reproducible feature set

On Tue 2016-03-29 20:58:32 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote: > not wanting to spoil the fun, but… > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:33:49PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > Ah great! And one less way to leak local information. >> yep :) > > I *believe* it's not enough (for reproducible builds in

Bug#759886: [patch #8925] Support --clamp-mtime for binary reproducibility]

Hi Guillem, FYI, GNU tar's upstream has accepted our patch! :-) cheers, Holger - Forwarded message from Sergey Poznyakoff - Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:33:34 + From: Sergey Poznyakoff To: Sergey Poznyakoff

Bug#819194: dpkg-buildflags: please add normalizedebugpath to reproducible feature set

Hi, not wanting to spoil the fun, but… On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:33:49PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Ah great! And one less way to leak local information. > yep :) I *believe* it's not enough (for reproducible builds in arbitrary pathes) if gcc+clang can now cope. IIRC there are

Bug#804624: please improve support for installing foreign packages to chroots and add DPKG_ROOT

Hi! On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 00:01:48 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.18.3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: rebootstrap > Thank you very much for discussing the idea of DPKG_ROOT and recording > some results at