Hi Tomas,
Tomas Pospisek ezt írta (időpont: 2021. nov. 28., V,
16:25):
>
> Rustam wrote on 12 Oct 2021:
>
> > Hi Guillem,
> > Any news on the proposed patch?
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892664#49
> > Can it be merged already? ;)
> > Ubuntu packages are already using
Hi,
For the record I'm not working on this anymore.
Feel free to either close the bug or pick the work up from here. IMO
there is not much to worry about enabling bindnow since Ubuntu enabled
it in 16.10.
Cheers,
Balint
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain%20/CompilerFlags/#A-Wl.2C-z.2Cnow
Control: notfound -1 1.18.4
Development on this port is stalled thus I close this bug for the time
there is no progress to help managing the dpkg bug count.
I'll reopen the bug when the hardened port makes some progress again.
Thanks.
Balint
2016-12-15 23:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
> On 15.12.2016 13:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 12:54:41 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Package: dpkg-dev
>>> Version: 1.18.15
>>> Severity: important
>>> Tags: sid stretch
>>>
>>> This is seen on all
Hi Matthias,
2016-12-14 15:09 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org>:
> On 14.12.2016 13:58, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> 2016-11-06 13:20 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
>>> Hi Guillem,
>>>
>>> 2016
Hi All,
2016-11-06 13:20 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
> Hi Guillem,
>
> 2016-10-27 23:49 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-10-26 13:46 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
>>&g
Hi Guillem,
2016-11-24 17:00 GMT+01:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
> On 11/24/2016 04:35 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>> clone 845193 -1
>>> reassign -1 dpkg
>>> retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add
Hi,
2016-11-04 4:42 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:45:46 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> This may be a silly / obvious question to ask, but:
>> do any of the proposed hardening options _really_ change the ABI?
>
> I don't think it's silly at
Hi Guillem,
2016-10-27 23:49 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-26 13:46 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-10-26 5:00 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
>>> Hi
Hi,
2016-10-26 13:46 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-26 5:00 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 03:20:59 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> For the record gcc-6/6.2.0-7
2016-10-26 17:21 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-26 5:41 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 05:08:52 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 00:48:17 +
Hi,
2016-10-26 5:41 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 05:08:52 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 00:48:17 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> > 2016-09-04 3:03 GMT+02:00 Balint Reczey <bal...@balintrecz
Hi,
2016-10-26 5:00 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 03:20:59 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> For the record gcc-6/6.2.0-7 enabled bindnow for the architectures
>> where PIE is enabled by default. I think enabling bindnow f
Hi Guillem,
For the record gcc-6/6.2.0-7 enabled bindnow for the architectures where
PIE is enabled by default. I think enabling bindnow from dpkg would be
better through the hardening flags because packages could disable it
in a nicer and already established way.
Cheers,
Balint
2016-10-10
Hi Guillem,
gcc-6/6.2.0-7 has just been uploaded with the changed defaults.
The list of architectures is a bit different than the one in the attaches patch.
The updated list is:
amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel mips64el ppc64el s390x
Cheers,
Balint
2016-09-07 0:48 GMT+02:00 Bálint
Hi Guillem,
I'm rebuilding all packages failed with the original patch and a good share
does compile with the following additional patches.
I would have preferred only the original patch, but apparently this is
our best chance for enabling PIE for the archive.
I'll start filing bugs for for the
Hi Guillem,
2016-03-09 12:09 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:29:04 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
>> > Actually setting bindnow and PIE would be fi
Hi Guillem,
2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
> Control: block -1 by 812782
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 12:55:42 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2016-01-29 0:46 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>:
>> > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at
Hi Guillem,
2016-01-29 0:42 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:23:43 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.18.4
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>> User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
>> Usertags: hardened1-linux-amd64
>
>>
Hi Gulliem,
2014-09-07 17:26 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org:
Hi!
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 15:01:35 +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'm working on a new port, hardened-amd64 [1].
This does not what dpkg ports are meant
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.14
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Running tests from Valgrind revealed an off-by-one error in Dpkg. The
first attached patch fixes it and the second just simplifies a
function I looked at while making the first fix.
Please consider accepting the first patch
21 matches
Mail list logo