Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.9
Severity: important
Hi,
On my amd64 system I installed libc6-amd64:i386, to see how that
behaves.
libc6:amd64 has a:
Replaces: libc6-amd64
The file they have in common is the dynamic linker:
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
It's the only file they have in common, and
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
That specific dpkg string is coming from dpkg --compare-versions, so
someone somewhere is explicitly calling that one, and thus not really
a dpkg bug. Kurt could you check the call trace to see exactly who?
And then
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.7.2
This might be related to #582819
I have:
- ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1 with a config file
- ntp 1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 that removed the config file
- ntp 1:4.2.6.p1+dfsg-1 that tries to clean up the removed config
file.
If I tell that 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1 was the latest version
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I have:
- ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1 with a config file
- ntp 1:4.2.6+dfsg-1 that removed the config file
- ntp 1:4.2.6.p1+dfsg-1 that tries to clean up the removed config
file
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.7.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It's currently auto creating patches for things that changed
compared to the upstream version. I find it rather annoying,
because most of the time it's something left behind that just
needed to be cleaned up, like a .orig or .rej file
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
forcemerge 480638 571671
thanks
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It seems that for some reason dpkg-checkbuilddeps now adds the
package build-essential to the Build-Depends, getting me:
$ dpkg-checkbuilddeps
dpkg
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that for some reason dpkg-checkbuilddeps now adds the
package build-essential to the Build-Depends, getting me:
$ dpkg-checkbuilddeps
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: build-essential
The package build-essential is
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.25
Severity: important
Hi,
I've got this message again on the buildds:
Removing fontconfig ...
dpkg: error processing fontconfig (--purge):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: ../../lib/dump.c:186: w_status: Assertion `pigp-trigpend_head'
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:35:42PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-10-15 17:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 15 octobre 2008 à 10:37 -0400, Higgins, Paul a écrit :
I'm not sure where the problem lies. I saw that the packages
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
clone 458860 -1
reassign 458860 dpkg-dev
block 458860 by -1
thanks
Michael Biebl writes:
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.2.2-5
Severity: important
The latest upgrade of libstdc++6 on i386 introduced a dependency on
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:08:41AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I've binNMU'd gcc-4.2_4.2.2-5 on amd64 to get rid of the lib32gcc1
dependency.
Which wasn't needed anymore because it got replaced by gcc-4.3, and so
also got rejected.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.12
Severity: important
Hi,
When building wine on amd64 we get the following error:
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for
/usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so).
The problem is that /usr/lib32 is a symlink
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes (Accepted dpkg 1.14.7~newshlib (source i386
all)):
[stuff]
I'm very pleased to see all of this work being done on the Perl
scripts - I'm hoping for big compatibility improvements from Raphael's
shared
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
package dpkg
tags 432893 + patch
kthxbye
Attached is a patch that *should* fix this bug. It simply restores the
previous state of a package when a removal fails, instead of simply
setting it to installed. Preliminary
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:21:11PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:27:27PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
package dpkg
tags 432893 + patch
kthxbye
Attached is a patch that *should* fix
severity 432893 serious
thanks
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:22:00PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
OK. Nevertheless, I'm not convinced that this bug is release-critical, so I'm
downgrading to important again. Do not upgrade the severity to serious again,
as this bug is not a policy violation,
severity 432893 serious
thanks
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
severity 432893 important
Bug#432893: dpkg: Failed install followed by
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Kurt,
I don't necessarily think that this bug is not RC, I just assumed it wasn't.
Severity was set to serious indirectly by the cloned bug's severity. While
the severity against ghc seemed fine, I think it's unlikely
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 04:25:42PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
What version of dpkg and its depends do you have installed?
This happened on a buildd. The unstable chroot has 1.14.5 in it, and
that's what I tested this. The host system is still using sarge, so that
would be 1.10.28. Afaik,
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:50:33AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
tag 421291 unreproducible
thanks
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=commons-daemon;ver=1.0.2%7Esvn20061127-5;arch=amd64;stamp=1177691051
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=antlr;ver=2.7.6-8;arch=amd64;stamp=1177691078
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.3
Hi,
When extracting an unsigned .dsc file, I get:
dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package
(/usr/src/elfutils_0.127-4.dsc)
dpkg-source: extracting elfutils in elfutils-0.127
dpkg-source: unpacking elfutils_0.127.orig.tar.gz
Use of uninitialized
21 matches
Mail list logo
