Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-08 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Jan 7, 2008 6:22 AM, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, blacklisting repositories is not something acceptable. However, before closing this bug, it makes sense to verify that dselect doesn't show packages in Suggests: or Recommends: if they don't exist according to its list

Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-08 Thread Benjamin M. A'Lee
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:22:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: Since the Debian project apparently intends to continue distributing non-free software, should this bug be marked as wontfix? The point is not even wanting to distribute

Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: Since the Debian project apparently intends to continue distributing non-free software, should this bug be marked as wontfix? The point is not even wanting to distribute non-free software or not. Even if Debian wasn't distributing non-free

Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-06 Thread Benjamin M. A'Lee
Package: dpkg Followup-For: Bug #31352 Since the Debian project apparently intends to continue distributing non-free software, should this bug be marked as wontfix? Added to this is the fact that an APT frontend generally makes no assumptions about whether something is free or not (consider a

Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: Package: dpkg Followup-For: Bug #31352 Since the Debian project apparently intends to continue distributing non-free software, should this bug be marked as wontfix? Added to this is the fact that an APT frontend generally makes no assumptions