Sorry for the late reply.
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:29:58 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
Determining a file's type from its extension is weak and specific?
I'd say generally, yes. But it also depends on the
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:29:58 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
Determining a file's type from its extension is weak and specific?
I'd say generally, yes. But it also depends on the type of file.
Tell that to /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.p*.
Those are just
Now that the dust around the major changes in dpkg has settled a bit, I hope
that you can find time to take another look at this issue.
The blocking issue for us (D-I team) at this point for switching from
XC-Package-Type: udeb to Package-Type: udeb is that it increases the size of
the control
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 01:24:33 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2008, you wrote:
Joey, I don't think that that the Package-Type field ending up in the
binary package can be qualified as bloat given that except the filename
and the origin of the file, udeb can't be identified as
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 12:29:40 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Your continual closusre of this bug report
Sorry, but the closure was not intentional, just what was on the
Reply-To, and didn't see Frans reopen until later. Also notice you
also replyed with the -done CCed.
and refusal to listen to us is
Guillem Jover wrote:
Well then there's also the argument that there's no point in having it
in the source control either, it could be inferred from the section.
But those seem quite weak and specific ways to do so.
Determining a file's type from its extension is weak and specific?
Tell that to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Reopening as Joey closed it accidentally by using reply-to-all.
reopen 452273
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific
field Installer-Menu-Item
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping
Guillem Jover wrote:
There's 278 udebs in the current main Packages file. Each Package-Type
field takes 19 bytes, so 5282 bytes of bloat. In comparison the
Description field takes 49416 bytes. If you are really concerned about
bloat, maybe you could trim those down instead.
We are constantly
On Friday 11 January 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
Your continual closusre of this bug report [...]
That's not correct. I'm afraid you closed it yourself the last time by using
reply-to-all and thus including -done. Guillem only replied to your reply
and probably also didn't notice -done was still in
reopen 452273
thanks
On Friday 11 January 2008, you wrote:
Given the rationale, I'm closing this bug.
Joey, I don't think that that the Package-Type field ending up in the
binary package can be qualified as bloat given that except the filename
and the origin of the file, udeb can't be
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.9
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
During a build of debian-installer-utils, I got the following warnings:
dh_gencontrol -i
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: deb package with udeb specific field
Installer-Menu-Item
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: deb package with udeb specific field
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
Should we start converting to use Package-Type?
Note that doing so now would _add_ the Package-Type header in control files,
which I do not think is desired.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
The actual problem seems to be that XC-Package-Type is not included in %f.
Maybe because of the XC- prefix?
From a debugging session:
%f = (
'Architecture' = 'all'
'Depends' = 'cdebconf-udeb, di-utils (= 1.18)'
'Description' = 'Execute a shell'
'Installer-Menu-Item' = 95000
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 17:10:39 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The actual problem seems to be that XC-Package-Type is not included in %f.
Maybe because of the XC- prefix?
From a debugging session:
%f = (
'Architecture' = 'all'
'Depends' = 'cdebconf-udeb, di-utils (= 1.18)'
Guillem Jover wrote:
It's not included and has never been, because only the ones with B are.
But now it's explicit given that dpkg-gencontrol supports the
field. Package-Type should have been XB- from the beginning. That
information is pertinent to the binary package and not to the changes
15 matches
Mail list logo
