Bug#461327: important priority too high for dselect

2008-01-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Joey Hess wrote: Package: dselect Version: 1.14.7 Severity: normal Tags: d-i dselect's priority was recently dropped from required to important (#452652), but important is still a much-inflated priority (so is standard -- optional would be ok). dselect is not the kind

Bug#461327: important priority too high for dselect

2008-01-19 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Hertzog wrote: We have changed that to optional in the git repo. Did you also open a bug on ftpmaster's side? No, it seemed better to let the dpkg maintainers decide if I was right and handle replying to the override messages as usual. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Bug#461327: important priority too high for dselect

2008-01-19 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 13:20:42 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Raphael Hertzog wrote: We have changed that to optional in the git repo. Did you also open a bug on ftpmaster's side? No, it seemed better to let the dpkg maintainers decide if I was right and handle replying to the override messages

Bug#461327: important priority too high for dselect

2008-01-17 Thread Joey Hess
Package: dselect Version: 1.14.7 Severity: normal Tags: d-i dselect's priority was recently dropped from required to important (#452652), but important is still a much-inflated priority (so is standard -- optional would be ok). dselect is not the kind of core unix tool that policy defines as