Bug#229357: Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2010-05-25 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Good, good, progress at last. Please find a patch that is a port of the > > old patch.3.0 in the first post of #229357 and implement > > Build-Options: build-arch as specified therein.

Bug#229357: Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009, Bill Allombert wrote: > Good, good, progress at last. Please find a patch that is a port of the > old patch.3.0 in the first post of #229357 and implement > Build-Options: build-arch as specified therein. First, if Build-Options is not integrated with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS it shou

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Bill Allombert (06/09/2009): > @@ -202,6 +209,9 @@ if ($noclean) { > $binaryonly = '-b' unless ($binaryonly or $sourceonly); > } > > +$buildtarget='build-arch' if ( $binarytarget == 'binary-arch' && That probably would be 'eq' rather than '=='? > + defined(

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:52:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > You did not look well enough: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229357#304 > > This is in 2008. It has been stalled because I tried to embrace other > bugs while introd

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Zack Weinberg wrote: > I disagree that this is 229357. That bug is about Build-Options. > This is a new proposal to *unconditionally* use build-arch in > dpkg-buildpackage -B. I'm not going to play control ping-pong, but > please reconsider. It's all the same, we can't fix t

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-04 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > forcemerge 229357 545081 > thanks > > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> As is well known, dpkg-buildpackage -B does not know whether it can > > If you knew well, you would have known that this bug already exists... > it's #229357 a

Processed: Re: Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 229357 545081 Bug#229357: dpkg-buildpackage: support for Build-Options: build-arch Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch Bug#398625: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B: sho

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
forcemerge 229357 545081 thanks On Fri, 04 Sep 2009, Zack Weinberg wrote: > As is well known, dpkg-buildpackage -B does not know whether it can If you knew well, you would have known that this bug already exists... it's #229357 and you're not helping us by opening a new bug report. dpkg-dev has

Bug#545081: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke debian/rules build-arch

2009-09-04 Thread Zack Weinberg
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.15.3.1 Severity: wishlist As is well known, dpkg-buildpackage -B does not know whether it can safely use the 'build-arch' target to debian/rules, so it always uses 'build', which makes the Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Indep distinction useless unless you bend the rules