On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> But the bugreport was about that version 0 (which is false in perl)
> won't get handed over and it said that 0.0 is handed over, so I still
> don't see how that part with proper evaluating of the value is the
> issue here.
Hum, right sorry.
It was als
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > From changelog of 1.15.1:
> > * Fix dpkg-buildpackage/dpkg-genchanges to properly interpret option
> > -v0. Closes: #475916
> >
> > If that's the case please close it again with version 1.15.1 as the
> > version fixing it.
>
> Actually I haven
* Raphael Hertzog [2010-04-26 16:34:47 CEST]:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > dpkg-genchanges -sa -v1:1.6.5-1~bpo50+1
> > >../wesnoth-1.8_1.8-3~bpo50+1_i386.changes
> >
> > Still, I have changelog entries in the changes file back until to the
> > very first one, which is versio
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > No answer, so closing for now. You told me it might be a bad pbuilder
> > interaction on IRC. Feel free to reopen and reassign if necessary.
>
> It just happened again, and according to the build log of cowbuilder
> dpkg-genchanges is called properly
reopen 574024
thanks
Hi!
* Raphael Hertzog [2010-03-28 23:35:21 CEST]:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > It does, at least here. Can you show me where it doesn't work as expected?
> > Can you verify with dpkg-dev 1.15.6 from experimental too?
>
> No answer, so closing fo
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> man dpkg-genchanges says the following about the -v option:
>
>-vversion
> Causes changelog information from all versions strictly later
> than version to be used.
>
> Unfortunately that is not true. dpkg-genchanges looks f
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges
Hi!
man dpkg-genchanges says the following about the -v option:
-vversion
Causes changelog information from all versions strictly later
than version to be used.
Unfortunately that
7 matches
Mail list logo
