On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:15:33 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> just the remaining question: which are the architecture names for
> ppc64, mips-newabi and mips64? I see that I can "invent" my own
> ones, but I would prefer to use ones which are probably already used
> in other places.
ppc64 is a kno
Biarch is a hack, but maintainer is in control of this hack and probably
fiddle with a couple of similar options. So I don't think that using -a option
this way is a big problem, is it?
Indeed, it looks like a good solution as well. Matthias, are you satisfied
with this suggestion?
just the re
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Why do you believe that? I don't know of many cases where the name of an
> > ELF binary format got changed... but I haven't studied the question. That
> > said we have no official mapping between ELF format and Debian
> > architecture and the ma
On 28.07.2010 15:13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
So there is a (very easy) solution for that. I added -a option to dpkg-
gensymbols 1.15.6. I must admit that it was for different purpose but it
should work very nicely in this context. So:
$ dpkg-gensymbols -plib32std++6 -ai386 ...
or
$ dh_makeshli
Hello,
On trečiadienis 28 Liepa 2010 16:17:30 Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 28.07.2010 15:13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > So there is a (very easy) solution for that. I added -a option to dpkg-
> > gensymbols 1.15.6. I must admit that it was for different purpose but it
> > should work very nicely in
Hello,
On trečiadienis 28 Liepa 2010 15:08:54 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Maybe you want to be able use the same symbol file for both libstdc++6 on
> > i386 and lib32stdc++6 on amd64 (because in theory their symbol sets
> > should be identical AFAIU) a
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Maybe you want to be able use the same symbol file for both libstdc++6 on
> i386
> and lib32stdc++6 on amd64 (because in theory their symbol sets should be
> identical AFAIU) and that's what is this bug actually about?
AFAIU, that's right. He has a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 590563 wishlist
Bug #590563 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-gensymbols can't handle biarch libs with different
symbol names
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
59056
severity 590563 wishlist
thanks
Hello,
On trečiadienis 28 Liepa 2010 09:24:31 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > A C++ library like libstdc++ built for 32bit and 64bit in the same
> > source can have different symbol names in the 32bit and 64bit
> > builds, an
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> A C++ library like libstdc++ built for 32bit and 64bit in the same
> source can have different symbol names in the 32bit and 64bit
> builds, and different symbol names on different architectures. The
> current `arch' attribute only allows selection
Package: dpkg
A C++ library like libstdc++ built for 32bit and 64bit in the same source can
have different symbol names in the 32bit and 64bit builds, and different symbol
names on different architectures. The current `arch' attribute only allows
selection of the architecture.
dpkg should al
11 matches
Mail list logo
