Bug#1053481: libdpkg-perl: dpkg-source fails to generate (complete) Testsuite-Triggers if test deps have :native qualifier

2023-10-25 Thread James McCoy
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:11:32AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Right, nice catch! Given that these fields are based on what might > appear on build dependencies, I think it does make sense to consider > them an overlay on top of those. So I'll make them allow anything that > is allowed for build

Bug#1053481: libdpkg-perl: dpkg-source fails to generate (complete) Testsuite-Triggers if test deps have :native qualifier

2023-10-26 Thread James McCoy
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:10:46PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:44:26 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > > diff --git i/scripts/Dpkg/Deps/Simple.pm w/scripts/Dpkg/Deps/Simple.pm > > index 431c93bb9..da7aedbd8 100644 > > --- i/scripts/Dpkg/Deps/Simple.pm &

Bug#1053481: libdpkg-perl: dpkg-source fails to generate (complete) Testsuite-Triggers if test deps have :native qualifier

2023-10-04 Thread James McCoy
Package: libdpkg-perl Version: 1.18.8 Severity: normal Control: affects -1 src:zsh src:poppler src:libjodycode src:doxygen src:jemalloc src:jdupes src:libsdl2 src:iproute2 Any test stanza in a debian/tests/control file which contains a foo:native Depends will not have its dependencies translated

Bug#676796: [PATCH] libdpkg: Correct the check for width underflow in parsefield

2012-06-09 Thread James McCoy
Closes: #676796 --- lib/dpkg/pkg-format.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/dpkg/pkg-format.c b/lib/dpkg/pkg-format.c index 96185c9..338c206 100644 --- a/lib/dpkg/pkg-format.c +++ b/lib/dpkg/pkg-format.c @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ parsefield(struct pkg_format_node

Bug#476221: dpkg-buildpackage should support hooks, and possibly more

2013-06-03 Thread James McCoy
are the chances we can make some progress on moving functionality from debuild to dpkg-bp? I'd be glad to help if there's some guidance on what should be moved to dpkg-bp and/or what the next steps would be from dpkg's perspective. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy

Bug#728198: devscripts: debuild ( others) must reject debian/rules actions on unpatched source trees

2013-10-29 Thread James McCoy
On Oct 29, 2013 12:30 PM, Ximin Luo infini...@gmx.com wrote: Thinking about this some more, I'm leaning towards the opinion that this is more correctly devscripts problem. dpkg-buildpackage is quite a low-level tool I would disagree with that. dpkg-buildpackage is the standard tool to perform

Bug#735840: Please allow binary file debian/upstream-signing-key.pgp by default

2014-01-17 Thread James McCoy
/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy james...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#764965: dpkg-dev: Please add a Breaks: devscripts ( $fixed_version) after #764963 is fixed

2014-10-12 Thread James McCoy
(for at least the past 8 years) it would report the architecture. Note, there should probably be a period at the end of the message. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy james...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#764965: dpkg-dev: Please add a Breaks: devscripts ( $fixed_version) after #764963 is fixed

2014-10-12 Thread James McCoy
in 2.14.9. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy james...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#764965: dpkg-dev: Please add a Breaks: devscripts ( $fixed_version) after #764963 is fixed

2014-10-13 Thread James McCoy
. On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 21:49:17 -0400, James McCoy wrote: Fixed in 2.14.9. Thanks, changed locally, will include the Breaks in dpkg 1.17.18. Make that 2.14.10. I forgot to see if any other scripts were using dpkg-architecture too. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James