On 2017-08-14 17:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.24
> Severity: normal
>
> Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
> file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
> package), but only if the package containing it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 790040 dpkg
Bug #790040 [tex-common] tex-common: doesn't properly clean up legacy files
Bug reassigned from package 'tex-common' to 'dpkg'.
No longer marked as found in versions tex-common/6.01.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
Russ,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> This isn't a debian-policy matter...
>
My thinking was it would be beneficial for Debian Policy to suggest (but
not require) use of upstream OpenPGP signatures when available, because
such signature
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.24
Severity: normal
Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
package), but only if the package containing it is _not_ given on the
commandline.
,
| $ dpkg -S
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> it can't just move the file -- it has to ASCII-armor it. But still, I
> >> think that's the right thing for the tools to do, not add another file.
>
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> We do when the binary sig is small enough to be stored along with the
> inode, instead of requiring an entire filesystem block (4KiB), and the
> armored signature is not small enough for that :-( Of course, this
> really depends a lot on the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> it can't just move the file -- it has to ASCII-armor it. But still, I
>> think that's the right thing for the tools to do, not add another file.
>> (The ASCII format is completely equivalent to
7 matches
Mail list logo