Re: Is there any program to design a schedule of lessons?

Arg, forget my remark: Fet seems to be the tool I need. Thank you. On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:07:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > just a quick question: Is there any free program to craft > > >

Re: Is there any program to design a schedule of lessons?

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > just a quick question: Is there any free program to craft > > a schedule of lessons in a school? > > Not quite sure what you mean, but could 'fet' be in the class of program > you are looking for? It take information about

Is there any program to design a schedule of lessons?

Hi, just a quick question: Is there any free program to craft a schedule of lessons in a school? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend

Hi Blends developers today I sat together with some people who intend to update Debian web pages. On one hand they care about design they also care about content and structure of content. The structure should be unified and the content should be updated by not only provide up to date

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:54:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > so, PLEASE, open a ticket and ask the salsa admins to remove the > > > -team suffix, thanks. Done. It is now https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu > It was a pleasure for me to help yo

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:56:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > and then one can open a ticket and ask the salsa admins to remove the > > > > -team suffix, which in the case of debian-edu they will do as no DD will > > > > ever get that nick. > &

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

Dear Holger, On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:06:39PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > ... Silently removed. > > > > If you create a project on Salsa the suffix -team is added. So you > > > > can choose between > > > > > > > >https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu-teamand > > > >

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

Hi, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:23:26PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:31:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hmmm, may be I'm wrong. I somehow thought I've read April 30th. I'm to > > lazy to check all info. > > I've asked on #alioth for clarif

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

Hi Holger, On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 03:17:14PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I realised that the mini-debconf is after the shutdown of Alioth so > > that's a bit late. > > why / based on what information did you realize that? AFAIK, the quoted > stuff above is still true. Wheezy LTS is running

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

Hi Holger, On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:05:41PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 12:48:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Sounds very sensible. Please ping me if you do so since the web senitinel > > needs to know the new location once it is moved. > >

Re: Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 11:29:25AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > please dont move the Debian Edu package to the Blends group, because > then people wanting to work on Debian Edu need to become members of the > blends group too (just for that reason, so it would things more > complicated for no

Migration of debian-edu metapackages to Salsa

Hi, I'm about to migrate Blends metapackages to Salsa. Debian Edu packages are currently residing in debian-edu Alioth group (not yet existing on Salsa) while most metapackages are belonging to the Blends group (existing on Salsa). Here are my questions: 1. Do you want me to do the

drgeo is affected [lu...@debian.org: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?]

Hi, drgeo is in the list of mathematics dependencies of the mathematics task. I wonder whether the package should be saved in the Debian Edu team. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Lucas Nussbaum - Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:29:50 +0200 From:

xrdp crashed (hope this is the correct list to discuss this)

Hi, I wonder whether this is the right list to discuss this issue. A user has reported that the session opened from a Win7 machine to the xrdp server was terminated. I greped /var/log/syslog for any traces: Jul 18 19:27:48 sebio03 xrdp[91297]: (91297)(140047400961792)[INFO ] An established

Re: Bug#826901: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

Moin, On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:02:11AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > oh dear, I am so used to running debian/rules get-orig-source... Sorry for > ignoring the pristine-tar branch, thanks for fixing things in Git. No problem. :-) Actually I in Debian Med I move everything from SVN to Git

Re: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

upload - just git pull for the next version), Kind regards Andreas. On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:40:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > I think we should upload a fixed xrdp soon to enable its testing migration. > > Do you have any reasons not to upload? &g

Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

Hi Dominik, I think we should upload a fixed xrdp soon to enable its testing migration. Do you have any reasons not to upload? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

UCS School (Link to German page)

Hi folks, I've just read this article about UCS@school http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/23680/ucsschool-41-r2-freigegeben.html Is there any relation to Debian Edu work and if not why not or should we cooperate to some extend? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:25:41AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > Apart from that: Uploaded!!! As the package will go through the NEW > > queue, let's see what the ftp-masters say. > > Thanks a lot for the help and the final upload! Thanks to you both! > Meanwhile, I have started work on

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:02:09PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > There are some notes from Andreas and you in the changelog. I think they are > irrelevant for the public. Can I drop them? Drop whatever you think is irrelevant that I might have injected Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Without checking: After Building you get a *.changes file. Open this and check whether it has a Closes: line featuring all the bugs you want to close. Sorry for my brewity Andreas. On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > one more question: > > Is the

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:18AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > newest version is in collab-maint, issues seem to be resolved. > > Please test, and, if satisfied, feel free to upload ;). Very good. Unfortunately I can not test before next Monday. Mike if you can run a test and

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > We tried to avoid updateing to a new upstream commit as the one in use was > well-tested, but looking through the changes, there has been a big diff, but > almost all of it seems to be fixing warnings and code formatting. > > So

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > We know that GTK3 and/or Qt5 components are somehow involved. They seem to > reset the layout in some way on startup. Why and how, I don't know yet. I > also do not know yet whether this is a GTK/Qt bug or an x11rdp bug. We see

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:18:22PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > > Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now. > > > > Fine. Just let me know if I should test in my system which actually has > > shown the problem. I'd happily help out with testing. > > I've scheduled a

Re: FYI [debian-edu-commits] Cron <builder@administrator> nice make -s -C $HOME/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator check-and-build | tee $HOME/cd-build.log]

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:45:55AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > we run this daily via cron, so we now get a a daily mail > about this… Just for the sake of interest and since I might have missed a further use case: Why exactly are you running this daily? Kind regards Andreas. --

Re: FYI [debian-edu-commits] Cron <builder@administrator> nice make -s -C $HOME/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator check-and-build | tee $HOME/cd-build.log]

Hi Holger, On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:30:41AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > something broke through yesterdays changes, could you please be so kind > and have a look at what has caused this: What you call "broken" is a warning about what has actually has happened. There are now

Re: Bug#825004: workaround for src:debian-edu for 825004 (was Re: Bug#793667: #793667: forced depends (instead of recommends) using blends-dev (was gosa-plugin-netgroups not pulled-in when upgrading f

Hi Holger, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:39:37AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Commited to Git. > > thanks. You are welcome. > I've seen you also added a "closes: 825004" to our debian/changelog, > which I've rewritten to "workaround #825004" as that bug is about > blends-dev not having an

Re: Bug#825004: workaround for src:debian-edu for 825004 (was Re: Bug#793667: #793667: forced depends (instead of recommends) using blends-dev (was gosa-plugin-netgroups not pulled-in when upgrading f

Hi Holger, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:14:19AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:50:30AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Depending how fast you need a solution you could easily add another sed > > call in the new dist target to work around #825004. Feel

Bug#793667: #793667: forced depends (instead of recommends) using blends-dev (was gosa-plugin-netgroups not pulled-in when upgrading from Debian Edu squeeze mainserver)

Hi Holger, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:28:35AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > control: block 793667 by 825004 > thanks > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:53:05AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > thanks for the patch, though #825004 has broken the "dist" target for us > > in sid… > > > > I'll think

Bug#793667: #793667: forced depends (instead of recommends) using blends-dev (was gosa-plugin-netgroups not pulled-in when upgrading from Debian Edu squeeze mainserver)

regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de >From 790b24ed7bccc0569b0f7c36fc6d24a136951404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:30:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Hack in gosa-plugin-netgroups as Depends (workaround for #793667) --- Makef

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:20:58PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > > Do you have any news for this last showstopper to upload the new version > > (at least I'd upload once this is fixed). > > Well, at least I got hold of a client system fortesting by now. Fine. Just let me know if I

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:21:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I think we will be able to fix this issue. > > Sound promissing after "setxkbmap de" seems to fix the issue. Do you have any news for this last showstopper to upload the new version

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > I definitely needed to install xorgxrdp as well to get my normal desktop > > as usual. While on normal apt-get installs Recommends are installed I > > wonder what alternative could bring up a sensible desktop otherwise and > >

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:00:32PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Him > > > Seems like you forgot to add debian/startwm.sh to the repository. > > Oops, yes, it got lost somewhere. > > I added it now. Thanks. I think we are quite there. I cleaned up the changelog from my previous

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > >How has got this knowledge and how. > > We have been running this commit in production for almost a year. We started > with what used to be HEAD for a very long time. It was bleeding edge whem we > started. The

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Mike, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:17:07AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > Personally, I am not a great fan of gbp. It has caused me more trouble than > served any good (and I really think that gbp is a great tool for Debian > packaging, as I said, my personal workflow does not use it). > >

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > > We have been running this commit in production for almost a year. We started > with what used to be HEAD for a very long time. It was bleeding edge whem we > started. The specific commit used now is that state that

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > >> * It only contains debian/ now. > > > >Do you have any reason for this? > > Yes, because that's what Mike originally asked for, unless I got him wrong. I do not see any good reason for this kind of advise. Mike,

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, thanks for working on xrdp and commiting to the repository. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:34:35PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > * It only contains debian/ now. Do you have any reason for this? > * get-orig-source fetches sources from GitHub, depending on package >version and

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi Dominik, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45:47PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Also, I kindly ask you to co-maintain the package after I got it finalised on > Monday. Comaintenance is confirmed. Thanks for the status upgrade Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

ory makes me really nervous. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:11:29PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > > > I think that all previous uploads to Debian should be in the repo. Plus your > > cha

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > I think that all previous uploads to Debian should be in the repo. Plus your > changes. +1 Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > >sorry for nagging constantly but you expected to be done until middle > >of > >last week. > > No. I said I'd be done until middle of *this* week, and I actually got > publishing the stuff on my todo list for tomorrow.

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Andreas. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:06:25PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:21:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > > > > In that case, please let us finalise the work ;). I expect it to be done > > until > > middle of the week. > > J

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:21:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > > In that case, please let us finalise the work ;). I expect it to be done > until > middle of the week. Just for my understanding: To what repository are you pushing intermediate changes to follow your steps? Kind regards and

Re: New package lists for debian-edu tasks

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Btw, what about making one of the packages depend on the other, and only > maintain the list in one spot? I'd support this due to less maintenance burden. (I somehow feel that the 10th anniversary of my plan to resolve

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:21:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > In that case, please let us finalise the work ;). I expect it to be done > until > middle of the week. Sounds good. My favourite way to do this would be to clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/xrdp.git to the

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

Hi, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:59:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > most of your concerns are being addressed already (restoring history and > such). The current master branch of the repository you named[1] starts with xrdp (0.9.0~git20150318-1~alpha1) teckids; urgency=medium * New

Re: Bug#719624: Upgrading xrdp

[Setting reply-to Debian-Edu] On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:29:12PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > >If anybody of the people responding tp the ITA bug like to become the > >main maintainer of the package I'd be more than happy to sponsor the > >package. As far as the situation is now I'll upload my

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi, it seems nobody has minded seriously to maintain debian-edu tasks. Any volunteer? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Bug#806420: debian-edu: test suite times out on ci.debian.net

Hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:44:35AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Not all the metapackages are co-installable Why? Which ones? Why is a Conflicts missing if there are such? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Support for this petition

Hi, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:13:06AM +0200, Bernd Zeitzen wrote: Thank you for the heads up. I've signed it after getting some help from the web translation services to understand it. :) Fine that you have signed the petition. I'm not sure whether signatures from Norway help - but cool

Re: Apropos Jessie release notes (Was: [Debian Wiki] Update of DebianEdu/ReleaseNotes/Jessie by WolfgangSchweer)

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:22:24PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: On Freitag, 17. April 2015, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: Thanks for the hint, seems to be a good idea. indeed, thanks Andreas! :-) Make sure somebody will really send the text to the BTS. Reviewers and Translators need some time

Apropos Jessie release notes (Was: [Debian Wiki] Update of DebianEdu/ReleaseNotes/Jessie by WolfgangSchweer)

Hi, since you are discussing about Jessie release notes: I'd consider it sensible to mention Debian Edu also in: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk?view=markup You can do so by reporting a bug against other / release-notes and providing a

Re: Apropos Jessie release notes (Was: [Debian Wiki] Update of DebianEdu/ReleaseNotes/Jessie by WolfgangSchweer)

Hi Wolfgang, On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 06:16:17PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: Thanks for the hint, seems to be a good idea. Maybe something like this could be added, feedback welcome: section id=debian-edu titleNews from Debian Edu Blend/title paraThe Debian Edu team was able to

Bug#782056: education-mathematics: Education-mathematics 1.811 has few empty/virtual packages in Jessie.

Hi, On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:31:00PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: @Peter, I had considered what you are/were saying. But then the same thing should apply to python 2.6 and so much else (as python 2.6 was in squeeze and wheezy) and now we are using python 2.7 Question: Where did you found

Bug#782056: education-mathematics: Education-mathematics 1.811 has few empty/virtual packages in Jessie.

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:54:41AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [shirish शिरीष] These are shown as suggests of education-mathematics. See:- That is how our meta packages are intended to work. We place packages listed in the task files but missing in the suite we target in suggests to

Re: Just for fun - Catalan release manual for Jessie

ROFL (needed to forward this to debian-curiosa)! On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:00:37PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: This is funny :) Fer el real upgrade. sed -i /wheezy/jessie/g' /etc/Fonts/aptes.La Llista apta-aconseguir actualitzar apte-aconseguir -y dist-upgrade apte-aconseguir -f

Bug#779644: debian-edu: package pxelinux is missing after upgrade from wheezy

Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:36:43AM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: Back to the bug issue, just an idea (/me being more or less a plumber, no coder): As cfengine is run upon upgrade, it should be possible to install the missing packages using a cfengine shellscript similar to

Bug#779644: debian-edu: package pxelinux is missing after upgrade from wheezy

Hi Petter, On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:23:27PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: blends-dev used to generate depends, and it did not work well. Nitpicking: Neither cdd-dev nor blends-dev ever generated depends but debian-edu used to create depends and stopped this even before it became what

Bug#779644: debian-edu: package pxelinux is missing after upgrade from wheezy

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03:50AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 11. März 2015, Andreas Tille wrote: Blends-dev has never behaved that Depends in the tasks file ended up in a Depends in debian/contol. This was even the case before blends-dev existed and the behaviour was taken

Bug#779644: debian-edu: package pxelinux is missing after upgrade from wheezy

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:13:20PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: cc:ing Andreas as I this is caused by blends-dev: On Dienstag, 10. März 2015, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: why is it missing? It was/is not available in wheezy neither (according to

Re: DebConf15: Call for Sprints

[sorry for cross-posting - I have set Reply-To to debian-spri...@lists.debian.org, debian-ble...@lists.debian.org] Hi, as a response to the DebConf team announcement I have createt an entry at the Sprint wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2015/Blends The idea is to gather people who

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi Holger, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:44:35AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sonntag, 21. September 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: I'd strongly recommend to spend 3-4 hours on this task. The Blends logfiles I mentioned in the bug report are sufficient help to do it properly. the long list

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi Holger, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:28:38AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: and thus distracts / blurries the view. For example: 2014-10-22 07:09:21,766 - INFO - (190): Blend debian-edu task common: Package ion2 is provided in Ubuntu ion2 is dead since years (6 or 7 or so... years!), so I

Re: shall we keep collecting suggestions in the task files?

Hi Holger, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: as we keep many suggestions, candidates, Keeping candidates is perfectly supported. However, you can ... and should provide some metadata for candidates. The way you can do this is either 1. Add some rudimentary

Re: shall we keep collecting suggestions in the task files?

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:21:32PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: 1. Add some rudimentary packaging in your packaging VCS containing a valid d/changelog, d/control including Homepage and description and optionally a DEP5

Re: shall we keep collecting suggestions in the task files?

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: (do I need to you cc: you, Andreas?) I'd prefer CCing Debian Edu list (since it is not subscribed to the bug) On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Try debcheckout debian-med instead. The tasks pages

Re: What should we do about linuxsignpost.org?

Hi Petter, On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 03:13:41PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Is there a good alternative maintained by someone else that is providing a similar web service? Not really similar but I previously mentioned that the tasks pages to some extend serve the same purpose. (These

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi, On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:01:28AM +0300, Bob Bib wrote: 2014-09-18, Andreas Tille: Would you volunteer to go further than this start and review all tasts which is deperately needed? Too much cleanup work needed, not for me, sorry... However, I tried to revise the 'desktop-lxde' task

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi Bob, thanks for your input which is definitely helpful. Would you volunteer to go further than this start and review all tasts which is deperately needed? I'd vote to grant you commit permissions in this case to maintain the files directly rather than patches in BTS. Kind regards

Re: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel

Hi Mike, On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:08:27AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) can be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right? Why do you think only this is would make sense? IMHO it would make perfectly sense to feed a freshly

Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel

Hi, yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1]. I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all in the list of the bug report #758116 which IMHO fits the criterion of actively maintained and

Re: Update debian archive override file for debian-edu?

Hi Petter, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:16:41PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: any more. It will override an empty Section or Section: misc by Section: metapackage which seems to be sensible in general when looking at #720199. (This thread reminded me about the issue.) Ah, good

Re: Update debian archive override file for debian-edu?

Hi, just to let you know: If you set blends-dev (= 0.6.92) (uploaded to unstable yesterday) you need not explicitly set Section: metapackage any more. It will override an empty Section or Section: misc by Section: metapackage which seems to be sensible in general when looking at

Re: Remove build-cruft from debian-edu src:package

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Holger Levsen] there is snapshot.debian.org for this. That sound sensible, yes. H, to me it does sound uninformed about how blends-dev works. You can't sensibly use snapshot.debian.org to approach the recreation of

Re: Remove build-cruft from debian-edu src:package

Hi Mike, On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:14:54PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: I have just added MATE support to the debian-edu src:package. While looking at that package a bit close, I realized that the code contains some build cruft files: debian-edu-task.desc debian/control (generated

Repository moved? (Was: debian-edu_1.715_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)

Hi folks, the Blends framework is checking SVN but cron job is now trowing: Target path '/trunk/src/debian-edu/tasks' does not exist Did you moved the repository together with this upload? Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 06:19:00AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:

Nice tool for teachers [Was: ITP: scolasync -- graphic tool to copy data to or from a set of USB storage media]

Hi folks, just stumbled upon this (long resolved ITP) and I wonder whether this package should be included in one of the Debian Edu tasks (which are *really* in need of maintenance, ping #726492). Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Georges Khaznadar georg...@ofset.org

Re: Bug#742453: ITP: geophar -- Swiss army knife for the math teacher

Hi, I'm not sure in how far a Debian Edu packaging team has formed and this package should go into Debian Edu team maintenance. At least you should regard this in your metapackages. Kind regards Andreas. 2014-03-23 22:24 GMT+01:00 Georges Khaznadar georg...@debian.org: Package:

Debian-EzGo and Debian-Edu (Was: Blends-commit post from fweng-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org requires approval)

Hi Franklin, On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:52:57PM +0800, Franklin Weng wrote: Hi Andrew and Andres, Sorry again for this svn issue. I've deleted the workaround folder from svn and moved it to my own git repository. As I said there is no need to sorry about a mistake as long as it is fixed

Re: Debian-EzGo and Debian-Edu (Was: Blends-commit post from fweng-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org requires approval)

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:30:35PM +0800, Franklin Weng wrote: Did you contacted Debian Edu people *on their list*? I'm reading also the Debian Edu - may be I simply overlooked this. Now mainly on IRC channel. Thanks to Mike and Petter, they helped me a lot on IRC. Ahhh - so it is only

Re: Mass deployment - can we learn anything from this project?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:18:01AM +0100, Ralf Gesellensetter wrote: Hi folks, Oliver just pointed to this example of mass deployment on the German user list. I wonder what we can learn from it, in your opinion? http://www.pennmanor.net/techblog/?p=1821 I have only read up to

Re: Why is the minimal profile suddenly so big?

Hi, once you are talking about design of tasks I'd like to take the freedom / be impolite enough to steal your thread and remind you about #726492. I'd like to repeat that tasks files are needing some love and we are just doing a reworking cycle in Debian Science. If you want to look into recent

Re: Why is the minimal profile suddenly so big?

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:43:37PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi Andreas, On Montag, 16. Dezember 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: once you are talking about design of tasks I'd like to take the freedom / be impolite enough to steal your thread and remind you about #726492. please let's keep

When will debian-edu repository moved to Git? (Was: Why is the minimal profile suddenly so big?)

Hi Holger, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:59:53PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Montag, 16. Dezember 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: Yes, for sure should bugs fixed in sid. now is the right time to change things in sid, in git. Inside an empty repository??? http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb

Re: Debian Edu Developer gathering in Oslo and Trondheim January 10-12.01.2014

Hi, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:02:53AM +0100, Knut Yrvin wrote: Please participate :) http://www.friprogramvareiskolen.no/Gathering/2014-01-10-12-Oslo-Trondheim Not really a time conflict with Mini Debconf in Paris - January 18 19th 2014 but a bit dense for me considering I have another

Re: git migration status

Hi Mike, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:15:12AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: I'm attaching the conversion script I used for converting Debian GIS and the according authors file which might have some matches in Debian Edu as well. The script looks very good. Thanks for contributing that, Andreas!

Re: git migration status

Salvador ota...@debian.org pere = Petter Reinholdtsen p...@debian.org plessy = Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org synrg = Ben Armstrong sy...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca tille = Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org a_valentino-guest = Antonio Valentino antonio.valent...@tiscali.it

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:55:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: Yes, there is a way. Inspecting the log I've posted. Could you please have a real look at the list? Could you provide examples from that list, please? You already

Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Source: debian-edu Severity: important Hi, Debian Edu tasks files are in a *very* weak state. You should fix all the packages mentioned in your tasks file because in the worst case you will lack those packages who are renamed or have better alternatives in your resulting metapackages. I

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

Hi Holger, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:24:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: Debian Edu tasks files are in a *very* weak state. why do you call it weak? Because we are less likely to notice new failures? There will be no failures actually

Re: Bug#726492: debian-edu: Task files are specifying a lot of not existing / renamed packages

. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: The approach remains valid - but this is *not* the problem in your tasks files at all. You did not updated your tasks files with not *yet* available packages - you are just keeping cruft. Thats my point: if we collect not yet packaged packages

Re: how-can-i-help Debian Edu?

Hi, On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 07:28:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I just installed the new how-can-i-help package from unstable on my Debian Edu Wheezy roaming workstation, and got this list of issues one could help with to prepare for the next major release of Debian Edu. If you

packages.txt files for Debian Edu installation media in new blends-dev framework (Was: [SCM] blends-gsoc branch, master, updated. 75b5171f9a66f8ef5bc49e8922375e551464c236)

Hi Emmanouil, when reading your commit log I wonder whether I fully understand this but IMHO the source package needs to contain all packages.txt.arch files to be able to create the installation medium for any target architecture in question. But may be I might have missunderstood something.

Bug#721467: please create https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debian Edu

On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 12:17:54AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debian Edu seems like the obvious choice to me, with a redirect from https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Skolelinux :-) There is https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianEdu (just without the space). Kind

Re: Bug#720199: section: metapackage for debian-edu packages (Re: Bug#719951: general: Autoremove Wants to remove Entire system)

Hi Holger, that's an interesting issue you are reporting here. IMHO it should be rather filed against blends-dev. IMHO we should create Section: metapackages except if some other section is specified inside the tasks file. May be it is even better to force Section: metapackages in any

Re: What a waste of resources

Hi, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:28:20PM +0200, Giorgio Pioda wrote: Or they really know what they are doing (see Prism)... Just imagine if HD producers have hidded storage blocks In this case I'd rather go with old hardware when Prism was not as advanced because potentially HD producers

What a waste of resources

Hi, two links how you could better use hardware if only some sane people would exist in the according institutions: Example in US http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/US-government-agency-destroys-hardware-to-clear-malware-1914296.html Example in DE (German only)

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >