Am Friday, den 13. July hub Jürgen Leibner folgendes in die Tasten:
[...]
I don't gave the vista thing the entry workgroup = skolelinux
So the vista thing was running under workgroup = workgroup which is it's
default.
What I exactly did is, to open the explorer and typed in: \\10.0.2.2\
* Maximilian Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070716 12:47]:
Am Friday, den 13. July hub Jürgen Leibner folgendes in die Tasten:
[...]
I don't gave the vista thing the entry workgroup = skolelinux
So the vista thing was running under workgroup = workgroup which is it's
default.
What I
Mapping terra to etch-test.
Accepted:
debian-edu_0.819.0.edu.etch.3.dsc
to pool/local/d/debian-edu/debian-edu_0.819.0.edu.etch.3.dsc
debian-edu_0.819.0.edu.etch.3.tar.gz
to pool/local/d/debian-edu/debian-edu_0.819.0.edu.etch.3.tar.gz
education-astronomy_0.819.0.edu.etch.3_i386.deb
to
started at 20070716-1641
*
* Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 163kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.skolelinux.no etch-test
[Holger Levsen]
as you can see from the buildd-log below, the debian-edu package is
not binNMU safe.
(That another binNMU was attempted is another bug in (the)
wanna-build (setup), but not really relevant :)
I am not sure your description is accurate. The problem is the choice
of
Hi,
fullquoting to make life easy for Marc..
On Monday 16 July 2007 19:37, Pere wrote:
as you can see from the buildd-log below, the debian-edu package is
not binNMU safe.
(That another binNMU was attempted is another bug in (the)
wanna-build (setup), but not really relevant :)
I am
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fullquoting to make life easy for Marc..
Thanks.
On Monday 16 July 2007 19:37, Pere wrote:
as you can see from the buildd-log below, the debian-edu package is
not binNMU safe.
(That another binNMU was attempted is another bug in (the)
wanna-build
-edu_0.819.0.edu.etch.3+b1 on xenophanes by
sbuild/amd64 98-farm Build started at 20070716-1641
*
* Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get
Dear Debian Edu Developers,
The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:
=== debian-edu-config:
= This package has not been in testing for more than 310 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
to testing for more than 775
Mapping terra to etch-test.
Accepted:
debian-edu-install-udeb_0.666.0.edu.etch.1+svn36293_all.udeb
to
pool/local/d/debian-edu-install/debian-edu-install-udeb_0.666.0.edu.etch.1+svn36293_all.udeb
debian-edu-install_0.666.0.edu.etch.1+svn36293.dsc
to
Mapping terra to etch-test.
Accepted:
debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36296.dsc
to
pool/local/d/debian-edu-config/debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36296.dsc
debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36296.tar.gz
to
Mapping terra to etch-test.
Accepted:
debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36313.dsc
to
pool/local/d/debian-edu-config/debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36313.dsc
debian-edu-config_0.413.0.edu.etch.1+svn36313.tar.gz
to
Hi,
the driftbook is the documentation for the woody based release of debian-edu.
The newdriftbook is the documentation for the sarge based release of
debian-edu.
Do we want to ship these outdated documents as part of the debian-edu-doc
package in our etch release? (The driftbook dont even
Hi,
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:55, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I am positive to move the architecture document to the wiki, but have
not started on it because of the problems with handling the figures.
Perhaps we can do some sed editing of the xfig image to make
translated figures? We need to
Hi Knut, Harald Klaus,
you are listed as the authors of the kursdok (*), which we could include in
the debian-edu-doc package, if it wouldnt be licenced under the GFDL _with_
invariant sections.
This unfortunatly renders the documentation DFSG non-free, so we cannot ship
it in main.
Would
Tirsdag 17 juli 2007 02:00, skrev Holger Levsen:
Would you be willing to relicence it under a free (according to DFSG)
licence? e.g. GFDL without invariant sections, GPL or the famous WTF
licence?
It's no problem for me using a GPL-license. Thats was my intent all the
way.
Best regards
Hey,
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 03:18, Knut Yrvin wrote:
Tirsdag 17 juli 2007 02:00, skrev Holger Levsen:
Would you be willing to relicence it under a free (according to DFSG)
licence? e.g. GFDL without invariant sections, GPL or the famous WTF
licence?
It's no problem for me using a
17 matches
Mail list logo
