Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:44:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up. > > That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to > > maintain ARMv4t instruction set was OpenMoko mobile phone, which lot > > of people was

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

>>>[+debian-embedded, feel free to adjust CC'd mailing lists on reply] Hello, Thanks for bringing up this discussion! And apologies for adding more complexity to the initial question. Find few comments inlined below, 2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk : > for the armel

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > >Also build daemons are aging, those were initially donated by Marvell >(some development boards) which then they replaced with other >development boards. We have been unable to find suitable hardware to >build armel port and current

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: >... > 2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk : > > > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up. > > That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to > maintain