For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
problems.
I noticed that right now, libc.so.6 does not link with libgcc.so, which
is a
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
problems.
Woohoo! That's good news for my
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
problems.
I noticed
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 2.95.3.ds5-10
The package description for this package (and every package the source
distribution builds) starts with the following note:
NOTE: This is not a final release, but taken from the CVS
gcc-2_95-branch (dated 20010125).
However, it looks from the
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
from the glibc make
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:14:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
2.2.3pre1 with it on
6 matches
Mail list logo
