gcc-3.0 packages available for Debian/IA64

I've uploaded experimental gcc-3.0 and supporting binutils packages to http://people.debian.org/~tausq/ia64/ They appear to fix some of the issues we've seen with gcc-2.96. However, at the present time there is no plan to move to gcc-3.0 as the default compiler toolchain for IA64 for the

G++ 3.0

Hello all. I am faced with a problem: my classes hierarchy is not compiled by G++ 3.0 Debian prerelease. I use woody branch and I don't want to switch to sid because I want to have a somewhat stable system. G++ 3.0 Debian prerelease ICEs on my (legal) code. I've wrote a bug report to GNATS and

G++ 3.0

Alexei Khlebnikov writes: I am faced with a problem: my classes hierarchy is not compiled by G++ 3.0 Debian prerelease. I use woody branch and I don't want to switch to sid because I want to have a somewhat stable system. G++ 3.0 Debian prerelease ICEs on my (legal) code. I've wrote a

Re: G++ 3.0

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't propagate. What's the hold-up on the sid-woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any

Re: G++ 3.0

What's the hold-up on the sid-woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in woody around at all... It has an RC bug, #105246. Update-excuses also mentions some problem with the doc packages but this looks like it may be spurious.

[no subject]

# these are bad, but not release critical severity 105246 important severity 103980 important thanks pgpLAocCVxWEe.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: G++ 3.0

#103980- [PR c++/3702] gcc-3.0 copies constructors, a build error in the sfs package. #105246:- [PR c++/3774 arm] can't compile a trivial program including string I just downgraded those two to important. They have been forwarded upstream, they aren't

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #105246 to gcc-gnats as PR 3774

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 105246 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#105246: [arm] can't compile a trivial program including string Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 105246 [PR c++/3774 arm] can't compile a trivial program including

Re: G++ 3.0

Christopher C. Chimelis writes: On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't propagate. What's the hold-up on the sid-woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't

Processed: Merging #97603 and #106285

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 106285 gcc Bug#106285: csh: va_list clash causes csh build to fail on alpha Bug reassigned from package `csh' to `gcc'. severity 97603 serious Bug#97603: can't compile with define gnu_source on alpha with stdio and curses Severity set to

Re: G++ 3.0

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Christopher C. Chimelis writes: On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't propagate.