g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

Hello all. When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O). Why is it happening? Is it so because of more complex templates in recent libstdc++? Is g++ 3.0 really a step further ? Regards,

Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O). Not sure what you asking. Are you saying g++ 2.95 is faster, or that the generated code is faster? Why is it happening? Is it so because of

Bug#118087: hppa operator overloading problem

Package: g++-3.0 Version: 3.0.2-10 This error is preventing ftpgrab from compiling on hppa. The test cases below do not exhibit the same behavior on ia64. fgfilegrab.cc:75: choosing `char FGString::operator[](unsigned int) const' over `operator[]' fgfilegrab.cc:75: because worst conversion

Linking Qt apps with g++-3.0

I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined references Qwhatever objects when trying to link. All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4. What's the problem? Do I need to rebuild the qt libs with 3.0

Re: Linking Qt apps with g++-3.0

On 2 Nov 2001, Brian Nelson wrote: I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined references Qwhatever objects when trying to link. All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4. What's the problem?