Back from vacation, suffering from the jetlag ... preparing a
gcc-3.0.3 upload for unstable. Currently scanning my mailbox for
patches. Anything else, which should be included? I'm asking, because
my unstable environment has been deleted during my absence, so I have
to restart from Chris' last
John R. Daily writes:
I sent this to the debian-ia64 list recently and received no
input. Given the apparent lack of concern about making such a
change, I'd like to inquire on this list whether such a change
would be technically and politically feasible pre-woody.
Matthias, I understand
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
Back from vacation, suffering from the jetlag ... preparing a
gcc-3.0.3 upload for unstable. Currently scanning my mailbox for
patches. Anything else, which should be included? I'm asking, because
my unstable environment has been deleted during my
I want leave the final decision to Randolph Tausq, which does (?) the
ia64 parts in gcc.
It's always refreshing to get a new name ;-)
Matthias, please update gcc-defaults so that for ia64:
g77 stays the way it is (points to 2.96)
gobjc points to gobjc points to 3.0
Thanks!
randolph
--
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 120333 g++-2.95
Bug#120333: menu: update-menus gets Bus Error on mips
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'.
retitle 120333 [mips] update-menus gets Bus Error
Bug#120333: menu: update-menus gets Bus Error on mips
Changed Bug title.
5 matches
Mail list logo