Bug#134051: unstable/arm: typo in arm specific debian_patches

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4ds2-0pre020210 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, you have a small typo in the arm specific section of rules.patch. you wrote ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),arm) debian_patches += arm-const-double arm-tune arm-gnus-source endif should be more like arm-gnu-source

Bug#134051: unstable/arm: typo in arm specific debian_patches

hi, On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:23:00AM +, Phil Blundell wrote: should be more like arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch. Can you make a binary-only upload with that change? I don't think it's sure. should i add an entry in the changelog, probably, what

Bug#134051: unstable/arm: typo in arm specific debian_patches

On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 11:41, Othmar Pasteka wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:23:00AM +, Phil Blundell wrote: should be more like arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch. Can you make a binary-only upload with that change? I don't think it's sure. should

Bug#129573: g77 crash with -fPIC, m68k

tags 129573 patch thanks Well, I think this patch will fix the immediate problem at hand. I've no idea why CONST_DOUBLEs were being rejected previously, so it's possible that this isn't a safe thing to do. I guess someone needs to take it up with the upstream gcc folk. p. Index: linux.h

Processed: g77 crash with -fPIC, m68k

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 129573 patch Bug#129573: scalapack_1.7-3 (unstable): fails to build Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 133935 serious Bug#133935: 3.0.19 net-install impossible Severity set to `serious'. merge 133935 123948 Bug#123948: woody CD not passing 'cdrom' argument Bug#133935: 3.0.19 net-install impossible Merged 123948 133935. tags 130394 - potato

Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

reassign 130394 gcc-2.95 severity 130394 important forwarded 130394 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 130394 + patch tags 130394 + upstream tags 130394 + fixed retitle 130394 [PR 5700] [ARM; fixed in 3.0] bug in __umodsi3 thanks The reason this one didn't show up with a cross-compiler is that the bug is in

Processed: Re: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 130394 gcc-2.95 Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'. severity 130394 important Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands Severity set to

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 134051 + pending Bug#134051: unstable/arm: typo in arm specific debian_patches Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

[±¤°í] Çöó¿öµµ»ç 2002³â ²ÉÁ¡À¸·Î ¿î¼¼¸¦...

Title: "" ...

Re: gcc in testing (2.95.4) can't a build working kernel

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: I'm attaching a patch for the SMP problem. I think gcc is generating bad code, but the function that it's generating bad code for is unnecessary. Unfortunately, upstream kernel people never saw fit to accept this patch. any chance you

Re: gcc in testing (2.95.4) can't a build working kernel

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Scott Venier wrote: any chance you have a similar patch to qlogicisp.c? I'm getting a panic on line 1047 (in 2.4.17's version of qlogicisp.c). Though, I also got that panic using gcc 2.95.2, but not using gcc 2.96 (not sure which particular one). I don't know much