Re: gcobjc

2003-03-03 Thread Guido Guenther
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Kant wrote: > i'm looking for a gobjc 2.95 tar file (not a package because i'm not root) > could you suggest me where i can find it? you can 'ar x package.deb' and then 'tar zxf data.tar.gz' if you want to extract the deb. Otherwise have a look at http://gc

Results for 3.4 20030302 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 2 13:21:45 UTC 2003 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi

Results for 3.4 20030302 (experimental) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 2 13:21:45 UTC 2003 Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bit

Results for 3.4 20030302 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 2 13:21:45 UTC 2003 Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/

Results for 3.4 20030302 (experimental) testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 2 13:21:45 UTC 2003 Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5) FAIL: pch/system-1.C -g assembly comparison FAIL: pch/system-1.C -O2 -g assembly comparison XPASS

Results for 3.3 20030301 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 1 11:59:00 UTC 2003 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfiel

Results for 3.4 20030302 (experimental) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 2 13:21:45 UTC 2003 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test WARNI

Results for 3.2.3 20030228 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003 Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: calls output FAIL: field output FAIL: final_method output FAIL: findclass output FAIL: invoke output FAIL: martin output FAIL: noclass output

Results for 3.3 20030301 (prerelease) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 1 11:59:00 UTC 2003 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi

Results for 3.2.3 20030228 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 28 18:29:14 UTC 2003 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C Execution test XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes

Results for 3.3 20030301 (prerelease) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 1 11:59:00 UTC 2003 Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5) FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test

gcobjc

2003-03-03 Thread Kant
Hello! i'm looking for a gobjc 2.95 tar file (not a package because i'm not root) could you suggest me where i can find it? Thanks:-)

Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa

2003-03-03 Thread John David Anglin
> Nice and is it also possible to produce a 64bits version of gcc? Last time I tried (couple of weeks ago), it was possible to build a 64-bit cross starting with 3.3. This still doesn't work with 3.2. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research C

Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me > > somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on > > libsablot0c102 package, which

RE: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transition on hppa

2003-03-03 Thread Joel Soete
>-- Original Message -- >From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.2 -> gcc-3.3 transiti

Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me > somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on > libsablot0c102 package, which appeared on the migration to gcc-3.2. Do you > recommend adding -lstdc++,

help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Fernando Sanchez
Hello, I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on libsablot0c102 package, which appeared on the migration to gcc-3.2. Do you recommend adding -lstdc++, or do you have a better advice? Thanks a lot