Please reenable GCJ on mips

I notice that GCJ ( company) are not built on mips or mipsel. What I can't figure out is why. GCJ is supported for mips*-*-linux* (except for mips64*-*-linux*, which is not supported) upstream in the 4.0 series, and I couldn't find any reported bugs on problems specific to it. GCJ was orginially

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode wrote: I notice that GCJ ( company) are not built on mips or mipsel. What I can't figure out is why. GCJ is supported for mips*-*-linux* (except for mips64*-*-linux*, which is not supported) upstream in the 4.0 series, and I couldn't find any reported bugs on problems

Processed: Re: Bug#330741: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 330741 + upstream Bug#330741: gcj-4.0: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream forwarded 330741 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24221 Bug#330741: gcj-4.0: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA

Bug#332499: java-gcj-compat-dev: Include placeholder jdb script for tomcat5

Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.30-4 Severity: wishlist Hi Matthias, I tested tomcat5 with java-gcj-compat-dev and it works with one workaround. tomcat5 checks for JDK functionality by precense of the jdb tool. It's sufficient for startup if it is linked to /bin/true. However I would

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: The toolchain (more specifically: ld) can't handle the gcj runtime build yet. Btw, ghc triggers the same problem, there were several reports filed for the various instances of this bug. Ah, I see. So it's binutils which can't handle it. No wonder I couldn't find any bug

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

--- Comment #3 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 22:21 --- The list of work/fail versions is very odd for this bug; it seems to have worked on mainline until sometime between 20050828 and 20050904. 3.3.5 passes, but all 3.4.x versions I tried fail. 4.0.0 passes but 4.0.2

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode writes: This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped. sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, it's just ranting. The problem is addressed, known to the

Re: lib64gnat-4.0 not available for powerpc

Xavier Grave writes: Hi, I have build the gcc 4.0 package on powerpc architecture (power5 based system), but there isn't any lib64gnat-4.0 produced, how can I try to produce one ? AFAIK, Ada is not prepared for biarch builds. Maybe the easiest way would be to build a 64bit ada in a second

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode writes: This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped. Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, it's just ranting. The problem is

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode writes: Nathanael Nerode writes: This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped. Matthias Klose wrote: sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, it's

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Matthias Klose wrote: If you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release team first. That's not at all what I think. I think that if there are known binutils bugs for your architecture, which supposedly

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.29_i386.changes

gcc-defaults_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.29.dsc gcc-defaults_1.29.tar.gz cpp_4.0.2-1_i386.deb cpp-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb gcc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb gcc-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb g++_4.0.2-1_i386.deb gobjc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb libgcc2_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb protoize_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb fastjar_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb to

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

-- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000 --- You

[Bug c/16676] [3.4 Regression] ICE with nested functions and -g1, blocks glibc

-- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16676 --- You

[Bug target/18823] [3.4 regression] [ia64-linux] ICE in ia64_st_address_bypass_p, at config/ia64/ia64.c:7387

-- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18823 --- You

[Bug target/22585] [4.0 regression] ICE with long doubles in expand_simple_unop

--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 05:32 --- Subject: Bug 22585 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-07 05:32:37 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog