--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:37 ---
*** Bug 24271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #69 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42
---
*** Bug 24272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to install ZOPE server on my debian OP. Since the CMS that I want to
use requires the ZOPE VERSION 2.7.5 I cannot use the apt-get install Zope -
method because it is always version 2.6 installed.
That is why I think that I will have to install ZOPE from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
forwarded 332683 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711
Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711.
retitle 332683
Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess.
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
- A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only
MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains,
Right, it would affect any architecture which does silly things like having a
16-bit
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:39:26PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
We have for MIPS:
- The plain GOT mode, where a GOT has a maximum size of 2^16 byte,
with 16k symbols.
- The XGOT mode, with unlimited (2^32 byte) size, which increases
code size by 15-20%, and reduces perfomance
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20051008.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Rejected: gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb: has 3358 file(s) with a time stamp
too far into the future (e.g.
usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.1.0/gnu/java/io/PlatformHelper.h [Sat Oct 8
22:28:42 2005]).
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
- MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is
hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build
without warning but will cause ld.so to segfault. This is the main
bug, and hard to debug (a statically built gdb
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:11:05PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
- MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is
hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build
without warning but will cause ld.so to segfault.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:18:23PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
What I keep hearing is that no one has reported the bug(s), and nobody except
Thiemo Seufer has even described it/them adequately. This is a bug or bugs
which is not documented in the documentation or bug databases for glibc,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
It's a lot of work to fix and no one has done it. That's not the same
thing at all.
That's nice, but there's still a real problem unrelated to that.
An example of a relatively healthy bug which is a lot of work to fix and no
one has done it is
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess.
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
- A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only
MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains,
Right, it would affect any architecture which does
Dear All,
Which is the latest version of gcc available to debian via apt-get? The
gcc.gnu.org site indicates that the latest gcc is 4.0.2 whereas if I
apt-get install gcc I get that 3.3.5 is the latest version.
I'm not actually hung up about having the latest version. I'm trying to
learn
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:10 ---
A regression test identified this patch from Neil on 2003-08-02 as thene start
of failures:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-08/msg00093.html
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:11 ---
Hmm, regression test in the last comment should have been regression hunt.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test
FAIL:
18 matches
Mail list logo