[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:37 --- *** Bug 24271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/24272] strange link error with ACE

2005-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19664 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations

2005-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #69 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:42 --- *** Bug 24272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: INSTALLING gcc (and ZOPE) on DEBIAN

2005-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I want to install ZOPE server on my debian OP. Since the CMS that I want to use requires the ZOPE VERSION 2.7.5 I cannot use the apt-get install Zope - method because it is always version 2.6 installed. That is why I think that I will have to install ZOPE from

Processed: bug 332683 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 ..., tagging 332683

2005-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 forwarded 332683 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711. retitle 332683

nature of GOT bugs (was Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess. Thiemo Seufer wrote: - A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains, Right, it would affect any architecture which does silly things like having a 16-bit

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:39:26PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: We have for MIPS: - The plain GOT mode, where a GOT has a maximum size of 2^16 byte, with 16k symbols. - The XGOT mode, with unlimited (2^32 byte) size, which increases code size by 15-20%, and reduces perfomance

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes

2005-10-08 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20051008.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2005-10-08 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb: has 3358 file(s) with a time stamp too far into the future (e.g. usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.1.0/gnu/java/io/PlatformHelper.h [Sat Oct 8 22:28:42 2005]). === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: [snip] - MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build without warning but will cause ld.so to segfault. This is the main bug, and hard to debug (a statically built gdb

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:11:05PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: [snip] - MultiGOT works fine, until the limit of 16k _dynamic_ symbols is hit. A executable/library with larger exported GOT will build without warning but will cause ld.so to segfault.

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:18:23PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: What I keep hearing is that no one has reported the bug(s), and nobody except Thiemo Seufer has even described it/them adequately. This is a bug or bugs which is not documented in the documentation or bug databases for glibc,

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: It's a lot of work to fix and no one has done it. That's not the same thing at all. That's nice, but there's still a real problem unrelated to that. An example of a relatively healthy bug which is a lot of work to fix and no one has done it is

Re: nature of GOT bugs (was Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

2005-10-08 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Nathanael Nerode wrote: Thanks *very much* for your help explaining this mess. Thiemo Seufer wrote: - A too large object file can overflow plain GOT. This is not only MIPS-specific, it affects several architecture's toolchains, Right, it would affect any architecture which does

latest version of gcc?

2005-10-08 Thread Maximillian Murphy
Dear All, Which is the latest version of gcc available to debian via apt-get? The gcc.gnu.org site indicates that the latest gcc is 4.0.2 whereas if I apt-get install gcc I get that 3.3.5 is the latest version. I'm not actually hung up about having the latest version. I'm trying to learn

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:10 --- A regression test identified this patch from Neil on 2003-08-02 as thene start of failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-08/msg00093.html -- janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:11 --- Hmm, regression test in the last comment should have been regression hunt. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are

Results for 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

2005-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005 Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test FAIL: