[Bug c++/24397] [3.4 regression] ICE in gen_subprogram_die, at dwarf2out.c

2005-10-16 Thread falk at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from falk at debian dot org 2005-10-16 08:43 --- Created an attachment (id=10001) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10001action=view) Reduced test case This is an auto-reduced test case, can probably be reduced more. --

[Bug c++/22551] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [ICE] in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843

2005-10-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 09:02 --- something is not quite right ... -- nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22551] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [ICE] in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843

2005-10-16 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||24399 nThis||

[Bug c++/22551] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [ICE] in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3843

2005-10-16 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 22:06 --- The new switch2.C test is failing for me. In fact, I'm not sure why we should see overflow warnings on these expressions; isn't 0x8000 INT_MIN? In that case, INT_MIN + 1 does not overflow, does it? The C

Bug#334296: /usr/lib/libgcj.a conflict with libgcj6-dev

2005-10-16 Thread Kai Henningsen
Package: libgcj2-dev,libgcj6-dev Version: 1:3.0.4-7,4.0.2-2 Severity: normal Subject says it all -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (996, 'oldstable'), (996, 'stable'), (995, 'testing'), (640, 'stable'), (550,

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0/4.1 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a other ICE, also while building libada

2005-10-16 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 02:03 --- Created an attachment (id=10005) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10005action=view) patch to fix ia64-linux libada build failure And here's the patch. It is simple enough that it should be safe.