Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
g++ 4.4.4-8 fails to compile ParaView on armel. See:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=paraviewarch=armelver=3.8.1-1stamp=1282234558file=logas=raw
[ 33%] Building CXX object
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 593675 + squeeze sid
Bug #593675 [src:gcc-4.4] (no subject)
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
593675:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 593675 paraview
Bug #593675 [src:gcc-4.4] (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-4.4' to 'paraview'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.4/4.4.4-8.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 593675 paraview
thanks
On 20.08.2010 09:55, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
g++ 4.4.4-8 fails to compile ParaView on armel. See:
Hello,
Sorry for cross-posting if not appropriate, I'm just preserving the e-mail
headers.
On Friday 20 August 2010 11:34:51 Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:51 (CEST), Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific
problems. Could you highlight
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:07:46 +0200
Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:51 (CEST), Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 15:51:21 (CEST), Neil Williams wrote:
To a point, but upstreams using stable also expect the dependencies to
build using the stable toolchain and there are still bugs outstanding
(one in my own package) where packages already in Squeeze fail to build
from source with
Hello,
2010/8/20, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
I don't think that stable is the place for doing active development.
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be made suitable
for active development?
If it's
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision 162774
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 -O0 (test for warnings, line 97)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90 -O0 (test for
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision 162774
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.c/lock-1.c execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/strassen.f90 -O
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision 162774
Target: x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-2)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision 162774
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.5.1 (Debian 4.5.1-2)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090303
Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org writes:
Hello,
2010/8/20, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
I don't think that stable is the place for doing active development.
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be
Package: libphobos-4.1-dev
Version: 0.25-4.1.2-23.2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
std.c.linux.socket only works on X86 because of
version(X86) ... else static assert(0); in lines 70ff.
I know this is fixed in the 4.3 package, but it would be really
15 matches
Mail list logo
