Bug#615157: Using -Werror in CFLAGS for a debian package build

2011-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05/17/2011 01:31 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: [...] see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-werror;users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian patch just

Bug#609690: Debian x86 32-bits built for i586 !?

2011-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05/15/2011 04:39 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:28 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sun, 15 May 2011, Mike Hommey wrote: I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which effectively

Bug#609690: Debian x86 32-bits built for i586 !?

2011-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05/16/2011 04:36 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: I think any claim that Debian supports 486-class processors is more of an aspiration. What maintainer has the time to test on such antiques regularly? Well, nobody is running regular kernel

Bug#615157: Using -Werror in CFLAGS for a debian package build

2011-05-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:31:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : What I didn't notice immediately was that gcc was emitting some warnings, but that the -Werror option was not honored for those warnings. Investigating turned up #615157 (Cc'd): the gcc maintainers have decided to disable

Bug#627084: gcc-4.6: miscompile PARI/GP SVN revision 12000

2011-05-17 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4.6.0-7 Severity: normal Hello Debian GCC Maintainers, gcc 4.6 on Debian/amd64 miscompiles PARI/GP SVN revision 12000: Step to reproduce: wget 'http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~bill/pari-2.4.3.12000.tar.gz' tar xf pari-2.4.3.12000.tar.gz cd pari-2.4.3.alpha ./Configure

Bug#615157: Using -Werror in CFLAGS for a debian package build

2011-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05/17/2011 02:00 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: Is there an easy way we can suggest to our upstreams to re-enable the errors ? That may be useful for them to update their code. - look out for / grep for the warnings - use gcc-snapshot - explicitly pass -Werror=unused-but... -- To

Bug#609690: Debian x86 32-bits built for i586 !?

2011-05-17 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: Assuming we can't just do away with i486 support for now, did anyone track down exactly what was causing breakages that forced the change from march=486 to march=586? libgomp assumes 586; there were some GFortran/OMP issues on i386. assumes 586 is