[Bug target/27880] [4.3 regression] undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/36439] [4.3 Regression] very long compile-time in PRE building gimp-plugin-registry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36439 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/35658] [4.3 Regression] between -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 and common block variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35658 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/38553] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in ggc_set_mark with -maltivec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38553 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/38642] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Code with -fPIC results in segfault on ARM (old ABI)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38642 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7 ---

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

Package: libgcc1 Version: 1:4.6.0-10 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** The link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1 is missing in /lib so link fails when this library is needed -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy:

[Bug target/25343] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] [m68k] testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25343 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7 ---

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

reassign 631627 gcc-4.6 reassign 631817 gcc-4.6 severity 631817 grave merge 631627 631817 clone 631627 -1 reassign -1 gcc-4.4 thanks Pedro Larroy writes: The link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1 is missing in /lib so link fails when this library is needed This link is not supposed to

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 631627 gcc-4.6 Bug #631627 [gcc] gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so) Bug reassigned from package 'gcc' to 'gcc-4.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-defaults/1.104. reassign 631817

[Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7 ---

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

l /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 ls: cannot access /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1: No such file or directory l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/ ls: cannot access /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/: No such file or directory dpkg -l | grep gcc ii gcc

[Bug c/23144] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23144 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7 ---

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

Pedro Larroy wrote: l /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 ls: cannot access /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1: No such file or directory l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/ ls: cannot access /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/: No such file or

[Bug target/38643] [4.3 only] Doesn't hide (visibility-wise) vtables and VTTs on ARM EABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38643 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Migration of multiarch into testing

I think I have found the root cause of #631627 and #631817 but I would like confirmation. My theory is: * on 2011-06-08, gcc-4.6 4.6.0-12 (and libgcc1) to unstable introduced support for multiarch. * on 2011-06-09, eglibc 2.13-6 was built on unstable against the multiarch-aware libgcc1. * on

Bug#615157: marked as done (gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:33:33 + with message-id e1qbekf-0002lk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615157: fixed in gcc-4.6 4.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615157, regarding gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply

Bug#631772: marked as done (spu-gcc-4.6: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:33:33 + with message-id e1qbekf-0002lv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#631772: fixed in gcc-4.6 4.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #631772, regarding spu-gcc-4.6: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found to be

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processing of gcc-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes

gcc-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.6_4.6.1-1.dsc gcc-4.6_4.6.1.orig.tar.gz gcc-4.6_4.6.1-1.diff.gz gcc-4.6-source_4.6.1-1_all.deb libstdc++6-4.6-doc_4.6.1-1_all.deb gcc-4.6-locales_4.6.1-1_all.deb

gcc-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: cpp-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/cpp-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb fixincludes_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/fixincludes_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb g++-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to

gcc-4.6 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lib32stdc++6_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database,

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.3

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #466911 (http://bugs.debian.org/466911) # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR35658 # * remote

[Bug target/25343] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] [m68k] testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25343 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:07 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Further research indicates that the version of gcc-4.6 currently in testing is not yet multiarch-aware; the first version with multiarch was 4.6.0-12; the latest version is 4.6.0-14. It should have migrated to testing five days

Processing of gcj-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes

gcj-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.6_4.6.1-1.dsc gcj-4.6_4.6.1.orig.tar.gz gcj-4.6_4.6.1-1.diff.gz gcj-4.6-jre-lib_4.6.1-1_all.deb gcj-4.6-source_4.6.1-1_all.deb libgcj-doc_4.6.1-1_all.deb gcj-4.6-base_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb

gcj-4.6_4.6.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: gcj-4.6-base_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcj-4.6/gcj-4.6-base_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb gcj-4.6-jdk_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcj-4.6/gcj-4.6-jdk_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb gcj-4.6-jre-headless_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gcj-4.6/gcj-4.6-jre-headless_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb

[Bug target/25343] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] [m68k] testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25343 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED