Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile /tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/gcj

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 633754 important thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:30:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: [...] (gcj-4.6 was never built on m68k before,

Processed: Re: Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 633754 important Bug #633754 [src:gcj-4.6] gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633754:

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: This isn't RC. It's not a regression, and m68k isn't a release architecture in any case. Sure. I just selected FTBFS severity in reportbug, but don’t disagree with that. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much*

Results for 4.7.0 20110709 (experimental) [trunk revision 176106] (Debian 20110709-1) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2011-07-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 9 21:26:04 UTC 2011 (revision 176106) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === boehm-gc tests === Running target unix FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors) === boehm-gc Summary === # of expected