;
we already have cc as an alternative. I'll leave that for others to
decide.
It should, gcc is nothing different than vi or a window manager or a
terminal emulation.
Attila Kinali
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Symlinks in /usr/bin belong to dpkg; you have no business changing
them
not supposed to touch them
by hand. But there is a default which version of gcc should be used.
And if there is a default there should be a way to change _this_
default _with_out_ using a workaround.
Attila Kinali
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:15:38 +0100
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Kinali wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/local/bin/gcc
LOL, this is a joke ? Right ?
No.
I still consider it to be one
on every update.
eg i have gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 installed currently,
with 3.4 as default. With the last update of gcc-3.3
all my symlinks got overwriten.
This should be denfintily fixed and done the correct way.
Attila Kinali
-- System Information
5 matches
Mail list logo
