Re: Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes: On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 03:03:01AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: That's the problem...let me remove that package and put this bug on binutils-multiarch. Try the build again Matthias. ok, the latter problem went away, however I still get the regressions (bus

Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: binutils,gcc-3.0 Version: 2.11.92.0.12.3-3 Severity: grave Tags: help help needed ... build log on vore:~doko/prot.3.0.1-1, build tree in gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3. two things: - executables generated with the new compiler terminate with bus errors. see the g++ testsuite: ===

Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Ben Collins
reassign 126162 binutils-multiarch thanks On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: binutils,gcc-3.0 Version: 2.11.92.0.12.3-3 Severity: grave Tags: help help needed ... build log on vore:~doko/prot.3.0.1-1, build tree in gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3. two things:

Re: Bug#126162: [sparc] unable to build gcc-3.0.3-1

2001-12-22 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Ben Collins wrote: Which files? The compiler binaries themselves (gcc, cc1, etc) should be sparc32. The libraries would be 64-bit. I just checked the binutils on vore and it does report supporting elf64_sparc, so that message shouldn't happen. Oh wait! binutils-multiarch