Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Should we do a debconf item for this? I'm getting tired of seeing this
question pop up at least once every two weeks for months now...and I'm
sure I'm not alone :-)
Maybe tag the bug wontfix and leave it open?
I wouldn't consider
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Shouldn't gcc-3.0 be an alternative for cc? maybe for gcc too?
/usr/bin/cc is provided by gcc, but not by gcc-3.0 ?
Greetings,
erich
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux marvin.xmldesign.de 2.4.18-pre9
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Erich Schubert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Shouldn't gcc-3.0 be an alternative for cc? maybe for gcc too?
/usr/bin/cc is provided by gcc, but not by gcc-3.0 ?
The short answer is no, gcc is just package built from gcc-defaults that
Should we do a debconf item for this? I'm getting tired of seeing this
question pop up at least once every two weeks for months now...and I'm
sure I'm not alone :-)
Maybe tag the bug wontfix and leave it open?
I wouldn't consider this bug as fixed, but as should not be fixed.
Actually this
4 matches
Mail list logo