URGENT: Re: report #126993

2002-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Christopher C. Chimelis writes: Speaking of bugs, can you take back 126162? I've fixed my part of it already and the ball's back in your court. unsure, who gets the ball, but not me/gcc. I tried to build an old gcc-3.0.2 debian package and an upstream 3.0.3 package on vore. All show the same

Re: URGENT: Re: report #126993

2002-01-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:39:58AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Christopher C. Chimelis writes: Speaking of bugs, can you take back 126162? I've fixed my part of it already and the ball's back in your court. unsure, who gets the ball, but not me/gcc. I tried to build an old gcc-3.0.2

Re: URGENT: Re: report #126993

2002-01-05 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Matthias Klose wrote: Christopher C. Chimelis writes: Speaking of bugs, can you take back 126162? I've fixed my part of it already and the ball's back in your court. unsure, who gets the ball, but not me/gcc. I tried to build an old gcc-3.0.2 debian package and an

Re: URGENT: Re: report #126993

2002-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes: On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:39:58AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Christopher C. Chimelis writes: Speaking of bugs, can you take back 126162? I've fixed my part of it already and the ball's back in your court. unsure, who gets the ball, but not me/gcc. I tried