anyone looking into #120333?

2001-11-27 Thread Matthew Wilcox
The followup to #120333 indicates this is a bug with g++; is anyone looking into this? i see no discussing on debian-gcc about it, but i'm reluctant to simply reassign it to gcc. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: anyone looking into #120333?

2001-11-27 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Matthew Wilcox wrote: The followup to #120333 indicates this is a bug with g++; is anyone looking into this? i see no discussing on debian-gcc about it, but i'm reluctant to simply reassign it to gcc. I'm trying to get to it :-) It looks very similar to an EH problem