Christopher C. Chimelis writes:
Do we really need the doxygen part anyway? It's not compilable on Alpha
unless we use gcc-3.0 anyway (and even then, it's untested...it's that bad
C++ problem with 2.95.x that kept it from working from what I can tell).
It's not needed for the binary-arch
here we go ... The packages are in incoming, built for i386, hppa
patch checked, libgcc symlink corrected.
known issues:
- doxygen segfaults generating the libstdc++-v3 docs (1.3.6 worked
ok). results in an empty html_user dir.
- the subreg-byte patch applies, but misses the two texi files
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
here we go ... The packages are in incoming, built for i386, hppa
patch checked, libgcc symlink corrected.
known issues:
- doxygen segfaults generating the libstdc++-v3 docs (1.3.6 worked
ok). results in an empty html_user dir.
- the
3 matches
Mail list logo
