On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
I don't know much about the qlogicisp driver since I don't have one (I
stick to symbios chips on my alphas since I'm VERY familiar with them from
my API days). Is that line the memcpy line? If so, what are the details
on the panic? Also,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
I'm attaching a patch for the SMP problem. I think gcc is generating bad
code, but the function that it's generating bad code for is
unnecessary. Unfortunately, upstream kernel people never saw fit to
accept this patch.
any chance you
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Scott Venier wrote:
any chance you have a similar patch to qlogicisp.c? I'm getting a panic
on line 1047 (in 2.4.17's version of qlogicisp.c). Though, I also got
that panic using gcc 2.95.2, but not using gcc 2.96 (not sure which
particular one).
I don't know much
Hello.
That's a bit of a broad statement in the subject line, so let me clairify
a bit. gcc 2.95.4 on alpha has some pretty nasty bugs. Because of those
bugs, it can't build many parts of the linux kernel. Some of the problems
are in device drivers (the adaptec 2940 driver is one, DAC960
4 matches
Mail list logo