Andrew Jenner writes:
Hi,
As Julian Brown previously mentioned, he and I have been working
together at CodeSourcery to fix Objective-C and Fortran (gfortran) for
the ARM EABI Debian port. The five patches below fix all but one of the
outstanding failures in the gfortran testsuite. Julian
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
reassign 467166 gcc
thanks
Matthias,
This is not a bug in gcc-doc-defaults package. If gcc-doc is
installed, 'man gcc' works as expected.
The issue is in 'gcc' package, that it does not provide the man page (for
those ugly licensing reasons), and does
Hello GCC guys,
I'm currently starting with java and wrote a little test program to
determine to max size of a data type (in this case short).
In the java documentation it states that all data types are of fixed
size, not depending on the compiler or vm used, still when i compile the
program
Package: g++-4.2
Version: 4.2.3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
g++ refuses to compile the following syntax commonly used to force a
std::vector to release allocated memory:
#include vector
int main()
{
std::vectorint v;
v.clear();
v.swap(
Hi Matthias,
maybe I made a mistake, but this patch doesn't apply to the 4.3
branch, and only parts of it apply with patch -l.
Oops, sorry about that. I've attached the patches as separate files this
time - hopefully that will work better.
Two of the patches (nested-function-alignment and
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 21:39 ---
Reopening as this looks related to secureplt.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 478734 normal
Bug#478734: g++-4.2: refuses to compile valid C++ syntax
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 478734 normal
thanks
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:55:19AM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Severity: grave
This is not grave, g++ is perfectly usable for other code.
I emmits the following error message:
bug.cc: In function 'int main()':
bug.cc:6: error: no matching function for
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
severity 478734 normal
thanks
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:55:19AM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Severity: grave
This is not grave, g++ is perfectly usable for other code.
I emmits the following error message:
bug.cc: In function 'int main()':
bug.cc:6: error: no
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: hppa-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: m68k-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/noPLT.C
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 18:06:49 UTC 2008 (revision 134487)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-4)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 18:06:49 UTC 2008 (revision 134487)
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-4)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 18:06:49 UTC 2008 (revision 134487)
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-4)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 18:06:49 UTC 2008 (revision 134487)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 18:06:49 UTC 2008 (revision 134487)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-4)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: getlocalvartable output
FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 output - source
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 12:17:51 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.1 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-3)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: getlocalvartable output
FAIL: Throw_3 -O3
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Why can't I take a reference to an rvalue?
Because you can't modify rvalues. This is the definition of the C++
language. The next major revision of C++ will have T rref, the two
ampersands declaring an rvalue reference instead
19 matches
Mail list logo
