Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 90363 + fixed
Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
Tags added: fixed
> reassign 90363 g77-2.95
Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `g77-2.95'.
> retitle 90363 [fixed in g77-3.0] f77 miscompiles PIC on arm
B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 85934 g++-2.95
Bug#85934: ICE on template class
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'.
> retitle 85934 [fixed in g++-3.0] ICE on template class
Bug#85934: ICE on template class
Changed Bug title.
> tags 85934 + fixed
Bug#85934: [fix
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated 29 Jun 2001 23:47:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [alpha] main() {char data[1000];} crashes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Installing:
gcj_3.0-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj_3.0-6_i386.deb
gcc-defaults_0.11.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_0.11.dsc
gcc_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
g++_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-4_i386.
Installing:
gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
chill-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to
extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 84935 aptitude
Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 79241 kicq
Bug#79241: improper (or failed) handeling of -I
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kicq'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:09:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug in code, not a gcc bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Richard Kettlewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: function attributes should apply to function pointers too
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: change-re
15 matches
Mail list logo