Processed: reassign g77 report

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 90363 + fixed Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Tags added: fixed > reassign 90363 g77-2.95 Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `g77-2.95'. > retitle 90363 [fixed in g77-3.0] f77 miscompiles PIC on arm B

Processed: reassign gcc bug

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 85934 g++-2.95 Bug#85934: ICE on template class Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > retitle 85934 [fixed in g++-3.0] ICE on template class Bug#85934: ICE on template class Changed Bug title. > tags 85934 + fixed Bug#85934: [fix

Bug#102528: marked as done (gcc-defaults: built with broken version of dpkg-dev)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#102191: marked as done (libstdc++2.10-dev has unset $pkg_ver in prerm)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#101876: marked as done (please change ia64 default to 2.96)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#92524: marked as done (Severe performance problem with sstream)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#100571: marked as done (libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#65364: marked as done ([alpha] main() {char data[10000000];} crashes)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 29 Jun 2001 23:47:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [alpha] main() {char data[1000];} crashes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

gcc-defaults_0.11_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: gcj_3.0-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj_3.0-6_i386.deb gcc-defaults_0.11.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_0.11.dsc gcc_2.95.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_2.95.4-4_i386.deb g++_2.95.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-4_i386.

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds3-0.010628_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb

gcc-2.95 override disparity

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): chill-2.95_2.95.4-0.010628_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pa

Processed: report #84935

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 84935 aptitude Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debi

Processed: kicq is built for unstable

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 79241 kicq Bug#79241: improper (or failed) handeling of -I Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kicq'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#64196: marked as done (g++: class method overload bug (qt related))

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:09:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug in code, not a gcc bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

function attributes should apply to function pointers too

2001-06-29 Thread Matthias Klose
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Richard Kettlewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: function attributes should apply to function pointers too >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: c >Class: change-re