DEAR SIR,
RE: CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL
HAVING CONSULTED WITH MY COLLEAGUES, AND BASED ON THE
INFORMATION
GATHERED FROM
AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION HERE IN NIGERIA, I HAVE
THE PRIVILEGE TO
REQUEST
YOUR ASSISTANCE TO TRANSFER THE SUM OF TWENTY SEVEN
MILLION, FOUR
HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED
Title: Greetings,
Greetings,
I am writing to describe an extraordinary opportunity
for you to provide financial support to Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), without spending a penny. You can provide this support at no cost and enjoy
reduced rates as low as 1.25% to accept Visa a
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 0.11
Severity: normal
Hi,
gcc, gobjc, and g++ all suggest task-* packages, which no longer exist
in testing/unstable. Perhaps they could be replaced by suggestions of
some useful individual packages instead.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
severity 98614 serious
thanks
Anthony Towns writes:
> severity 103980 serious
> thanks
>
> > # severity important is enough to be release critical, but it does not
> > # hinder the update system to replace the gcc-3.0 prerelease in
> > # testing with the final release.
>
> important isn'
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I don't get it. Are you getting an ICE or a segfault in binutils?
Segfault when I run 'strip -g' twice on the same binary (usually an object
file from an ar archive). Any readelf/objcopy/etc on that file after
the first run of strip segfaults a
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:22:10AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> One more follow-up...with the fsirl patch, compilation of gcc still fails
> (see below). I *might* be able to correct this *if* it's meant to
> produce proper DWARF debugging output. Otherwise, I'm faced with a
> terr
One more follow-up...with the fsirl patch, compilation of gcc still fails
(see below). I *might* be able to correct this *if* it's meant to
produce proper DWARF debugging output. Otherwise, I'm faced with a
terrible dilemma: leave 2.11.90.0.7-2 in woody for the freeze or leave a
compiler in wo
Ack! Didn't realise that we still weren't including that patch
Well, I'm trying to compile WITH the patch again :-P Either way, I'll
figure this out...
C
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> Oops...forgot to cc the list :-P
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ---
Oops...forgot to cc the list :-P
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:10:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Possible problems again with alpha and the fsirl patch
I just spent at least tw
9 matches
Mail list logo
