Creating Packages of the GNU Compiler and the Introspector

2002-01-08 Thread Dupont, Michael
Title: Creating Packages of the GNU Compiler and the Introspector Dear Debian Gcc Developers, I am a happy user of debian, and one of the great things about debian is the packaging system. One thing that I have been wondering about is how the packages are created for gcc. The

Iper1 para el comercio electrónico

2002-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Estimada empresa, Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrónico i p e r 1 es la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en internet, es un programa completo, potente y al mismo tiempo simple y fácil en su utilización y navegacion. Es Perfecto: para la venta al por menor y

Iper1 para el comercio electrónico

2002-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Estimada empresa, Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrónico i p e r 1 es la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en internet, es un programa completo, potente y al mismo tiempo simple y fácil en su utilización y navegacion. Es Perfecto: para la venta al por menor y

Re: Possible iostreams bug

2002-01-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:15:56PM +1100, Dancer Vesperman wrote: I've got what looks like it might be a bug in ostream/streambuf/endl interaction, rendered down to a fairly straightforward form. If it _is_ a bug, it's obviously an upstream bug. I'm unable to figure out just who and how to

Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big

2002-01-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion code for basic_string in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have already been fixed for 3.1; there are some spiffy benchmarks in the libstdc++ mailing list

Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big

2002-01-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Phil Edwards writes: On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion code for basic_string in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have already been fixed for 3.1; there are some spiffy benchmarks in the

Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big

2002-01-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Phil Edwards writes: On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion code for basic_string in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have

IPER1 para el comercio electronico

2002-01-08 Thread Javier Ramirez Lopez
Estimada empresa, Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrnico i p e r 1 es la solucin mejor para abrir una tienda en

IPER1 para el comercio electronico

2002-01-08 Thread Javier Ramirez Lopez
Estimada empresa, Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrnico i p e r 1 es la solucin mejor para abrir una tienda en

Bug#126125: marked as done (gcc: Hardly any cross-compilers available)

2002-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:08:45 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Debian crosscompiler packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big

2002-01-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Phil Edwards writes: On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: how stable is this compared to 3.0.3? Is the ABI upward compatible, so that it could replace 3.0.3? Good point. This is something a lot of people get confused by. Including me, so get your grains of

Re: Debian crosscompiler packages

2002-01-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Hakan Ardo writes: The process is documented in /usr/share/doc/toolchain-source/README, but should probably be placed where people might look for it. Where is that? Maybe you want to provide an updated README.cross file for gcc-{2.95,3.0}?

Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big

2002-01-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:51:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Phil Edwards writes: The library 3.0.95 snapshot is the 3.1 sources as of a few weeks ago, with the exception-handling bits tweaked to work with GCC 3.0. assume we want to get 3.0.95 into the Debian woody release, we have to