Accepted:
cpp-3.0-doc_3.0.4-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0-doc_3.0.4-3_all.deb
cpp-3.0_3.0.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0_3.0.4-3_i386.deb
fastjar_3.0.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fastjar_3.0.4-3_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.0.4-3_i386.deb
to
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-4_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-4_i386.deb
to
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2002 07:02:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#136359: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Bernd Eckenfels writes:
I have the feeling we have a very big GCC Problem in unstable and testing.
Some -O2 optimizations of gcc cause SIGBUS on aligned architectures (SPARC),
and now even on intel I get regularly SIGSEGVs. I have a few packages which
received those reports, and it looks to me
4 matches
Mail list logo