Submitter-Id: net
Originator:Claudius Link
Organization: University Freiburg, Institute for Applied Mathematics
Confidential: no
Synopsis: Template specialisation causes internal error
Severity: serious
Priority: low
Category: c++
Class: ice-on-legal-code
--enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib
--enable-long-long --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,java,objc --enable-nls
--enable-symvers --without-x --without-included-gettext --disable-checking
Thread model: single
gcc version 3.2 20020425 (experimental)
precise description
`hurd-i386' has just completed an ABI bump. We've been very careful
to keep back packages that depend on libstdc++, as I had heard that
there's some compatability problems.
Do you object if we declare gcc-3.1 to be our default compiler as soon
as you upload? I just read the archives of this
If you are unable to view the images in this email, please copy and paste the following url into your browser...
http://www.haestad.com/forums/09
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org not part of the Civil Engineering community?
Jeff Bailey writes:
`hurd-i386' has just completed an ABI bump. We've been very careful
to keep back packages that depend on libstdc++, as I had heard that
there's some compatability problems.
Do you object if we declare gcc-3.1 to be our default compiler as soon
as you upload? I just
can be found at http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc. For now, I
disabled building a shared gnat library. Any compilation with the
compiler built with the shared library fails due to an undefined
xstrdup symbol (at least on i386-linux and s390-linux). Upstream
cannot reproduce this, so I'll wait
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:03:15PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Hmm. We've already switched to gcc-3.0 (and so far haven't built a
gcc-2.95 - Our glibc doesn't contain the magic to make everything
friendly between the two) for all the C stuff. I wasn't sure if since
we had a clean slate (There
Forgot the list first time...
Should it be possible to have 3.0 and 3.1pre packages installed?
If so, is libgcc1 binary compatible between the two?
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
protoize
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Severity: important
The following bug report owes a lot to John Eaton's work. I reported a
problem with the octave2.1 package on the ia64 platform to him, the upstream
authors. Bdale kindly provided an account on ia64 for John.
There appear to (still) be
9 matches
Mail list logo
