Package: gcc-3.1
Version: 3.1-2
In rebuilding binutils 2.12.90.0.7-1 with gcc-3.1-2 on debian ppc sid
I discovered that this causes binutils to have a new unexpected failure
in its testsuite...
Running /home/howarth/debian-binutils/binutils-2.12.90.0.7/build-tree/binutils-2
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2002 11:03:51 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#148651: gcc 3.1-2 patch breaks binutils builds
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: gcj-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
I tried to use gcj-3.1 to compile an app I'm helping with development.
Unfortunately an old libgcj2 from gcj-3.0 was installed. gcj-3.1 used
this version of libgcj installed of the version of libgcj3, which was
intalled too.
IMO gcj-3.1 should
Package: g++-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
in modern C++ the style is:
#include cassert
std::assert(this_should_be_true);
however this fails to compile under 3.1 claiming:
parse error before `static_cast'
my code is not casting. The cast is coming from assert.h provided by
glibc.
Submitter-Id: net
Originator:Stephen Kennedy
Organization:
Confidential: no
Synopsis: xmmintrin.h, _MM_TRANSPOSE4_PS is broken
Severity: serious
Priority: medium
Category: c
Class: sw-bug
Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
Environment:
Package: libgcj3
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
libgcj3 includes the file called:
/usr/lib/security/classpath.security
Unfortunately the package classpath includes the same file.
Either libgcj3 shouldn't include this file or both packages should
forbid the other.
-- System Information
Package: gij-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
gij-3.1 contains the file /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.1. This file tries to
execute the file /usr/bin/gij-3.0 which is part of gij-3.0. It should
execute /usr/bin/gij-3.1
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux
Package: gcj-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 70743 [fixed in gcc-3.0 and gcc-3.1] [alpha] g++ -O2 optimization
error
Bug#70743: [alpha] g++ -O2 optimization error
Changed Bug title.
retitle 142844 [fixed in gcc-3.0 and gcc-3.1] [alpha] dead code removal in
switch() broken
Bug#142844:
As a short followup, I've had reports that the DAC960 driver compiles
correctly with gcc-3.0 and one report that 3.1 works as well. I've heard
mostly rumours that other known kernel driver miscompilation problems are
also fixed in gcc 3.x. Unfortunately, I do not have a DAC960 nor any of
the
As a short followup, I've had reports that the DAC960 driver compiles
correctly with gcc-3.0 and one report that 3.1 works as well. I've heard
mostly rumours that other known kernel driver miscompilation problems are
also fixed in gcc 3.x. Unfortunately, I do not have a DAC960 nor any of
the
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jun 2002 01:19:54 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc-3.0 report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Dear all,
I wrote some lines of codes like the following to verify if my gcc
could work.
int main()
{
int a,b;
a=a+1;
b=a+2;
return 0;
}
Then I typed gcc-3.1 t2.c in and it said /usr/bin/ld:Can't open
crt1.o:no such file or directory...
when I make
13 matches
Mail list logo
