Bug#198172: [arm] gcc-3.3 miscompile pari with -O3

2003-06-20 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-3 Severity: normal Dear GCC maintainers, gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas gcc 3.2 (3.2.3 20030331) worked fine. With -O2 gcc 3.3 works fine also The preprocessed miscompiled file is available at

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

2003-06-20 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: what's up with gts?

2003-06-20 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:01:19AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: This kind of thing usually means an ICE. You need to run a build by hand on debussy, and remove libtool's ultra-helpful /dev/null 21 from the commandline so that we can actually see the error messages. Ok. Did that. The

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

2003-06-20 Thread doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 --- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-20 09:32 --- Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c rearnsha

Bug#192634: [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm

2003-06-20 Thread rearnsha at arm dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730 --- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com 2003-06-20 15:50 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm Since I made that comment to

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

2003-06-20 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 17:24 --- Richard, I don't see a problem with this testcase with or without checking on 3.3 branch (20030620) using arm-linux cross compiler, so I doubt

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

2003-06-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

2003-06-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-20 19:30 --- Subject: Bug 10888 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch:

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

2003-06-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

2003-06-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-20 19:55 --- Subject: Bug 10888 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by:

Bug#175478: [Bug target/9201] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux

2003-06-20 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:21 --- Confirmed still present with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030620). --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

Bug#177840: [Bug optimization/9812] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148

2003-06-20 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:30 --- Confirmed problem is still present with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030620). --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

[Bug optimization/11054] [3.3 regression] [m68k] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p

2003-06-20 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:36 --- Confirmed with gcc 3.3 branch (20030620). --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [arm/m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

2003-06-20 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build

Bug#198261: g++ segfaults when using namespaced typedef of primitive type as struct

2003-06-20 Thread Daniel Brockman
Package: g++ Version: 3.3-1 First of all, I want to say thank you for a great magazine. I happened to stumble upon a little bug just now that I thought you might want to hear about, since I did not find it reported anywhere. The following code causes g++ to segfault: === test.cc ===