Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3 20030331) worked fine.
With -O2 gcc 3.3 works fine also
The preprocessed miscompiled file is available at
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:01:19AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
This kind of thing usually means an ICE. You need to run a build by
hand on debussy, and remove libtool's ultra-helpful /dev/null 21
from the commandline so that we can actually see the error messages.
Ok. Did that. The
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-06-20
09:32 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
rearnsha
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com 2003-06-20 15:50
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates
invalid asm
Since I made that comment to
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 17:24
---
Richard, I don't see a problem with this testcase with or without checking on
3.3 branch
(20030620) using arm-linux cross compiler, so I doubt
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-20
19:30 ---
Subject: Bug 10888
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-20
19:55 ---
Subject: Bug 10888
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by:
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:21
---
Confirmed still present with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030620).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:30
---
Confirmed problem is still present with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030620).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-20 22:36
---
Confirmed with gcc 3.3 branch (20030620).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build
Package: g++
Version: 3.3-1
First of all, I want to say thank you for a great magazine. I happened
to stumble upon a little bug just now that I thought you might want to
hear about, since I did not find it reported anywhere.
The following code causes g++ to segfault:
=== test.cc ===
15 matches
Mail list logo