Processed: Looks like a gcc bug

2004-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 285083 -1 Bug#285083: alsa-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'shm_sum_discard' Bug 285083 cloned as bug 285283. retitle -1 gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function Bug#285283: alsa-lib: FTBFS

Bug#285283: gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function

2004-12-12 Thread Falk Hueffner
Oh, by the way, do you know how often this occurs in packages approximately? If there are many, it would be nice if you could prepare a patch for the release notes (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html). Falk

Bug#285238: [ARM] gcc-3.3 -O3 -fPIC produce wrong code via auto inlining

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Bill Allombert writes: Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-3 Severity: normal Hello GCC developers and ARM porters, gcc-3.3 -O3 -fPIC miscompile pari on ARM. (see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pariver=2.1.6-1arch=armstamp=1102707589file=logas=raw) More precisely the file

status of libunwind patches for ia64

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
with the patch attached and an updated gcc-3.3 package, libunwind support for ia64 seems to work for me. I couldn't install any of the built packages. I'd like to ask people to install the test builds found at http://people.debian.org/~doko/glibc/

Bug#285283: marked as done (gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function)

2004-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:56:38 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gcc-4.0: Fails on static function declaration inside a function has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#285238: [ARM] gcc-3.3 -O3 -fPIC produce wrong code via auto inlining

2004-12-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Bill Allombert writes: If you want, I might dig farther into the problem at a later date. OK, I checked with gcc-3.4, and it works fine. I didn't check gcc-4.0 since bug #280972 would cause it to fails anyway. please attach the

Results for 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-3) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 4 07:38:33 UTC 2004 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: initexc execution - gij test FAIL: initexc execution - gij test === libjava Summary === # of expected passes

Results for 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-3) testsuite on powerpc-linux

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 4 07:38:33 UTC 2004 Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3910 # of expected passes 3905 # of unsupported tests5

Results for 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-4) testsuite on sparc-linux

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 11 11:20:29 UTC 2004 Native configuration is sparc-linux (sunofdeb) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3910 # of expected passes 3905 # of unsupported tests5

Results for 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-4) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 28 07:33:40 UTC 2004 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes212 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests

Results for 3.4.4 20041128 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-4) testsuite on powerpc-linux

2004-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 28 07:33:40 UTC 2004 Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3948 # of unsupported tests5