On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is possible to have various versions of gccco installed,
though none of the packages use the alternative system but
a couple of unrelated symlinks in /usr/bin.
Thus, these symlinks get overwritten on every
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is possible to have various versions of gccco installed,
though none of the packages use the alternative system but
a couple of unrelated
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:50:40:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43:
Ok, what is then the reason to allow multiple versions of
gcc if i'm not allowed to
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Symlinks in /usr/bin belong to dpkg; you have no business changing
them.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, how am i supposed to change the default compiler if i'm not
allowed to change the symlinks ? No, changing $PATH doesn't work as all
gcc binaries are installed in /usr/bin.
ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4
Attila Kinali wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, how am i supposed to change the default compiler if i'm not
allowed to change the symlinks ? No, changing $PATH doesn't work as all
gcc binaries are installed in /usr/bin.
ln -s
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:15:38 +0100
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attila Kinali wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/local/bin/gcc
LOL, this is a joke ? Right ?
No.
I still consider it to be one.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 242916 277206
Bug#242916: [fixed in 3.4] ICE on invalid #define with -traditional
Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9
Merged 242916 277206.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
merge 242916 277206
thanks
Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 16:45:19:
I tracked it down to a vsyscall.S file containing only the line
#define __builtin_warning(x, ...) (1)
and compiling it with
gcc -traditional -o vsyscall.s vsyscall.S
causes the segfault.
Ah, then
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:56:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
hmm, the network card of my A500 is currently broken :-( Lamont,
please could you check, if you can reproduce this? Dann, does
recompiling apt fix the problem?
I re-upgrade the box, which has been up for 45 days hasn't had any
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2005-01-07 21:36 ---
[tried to reopen the report, but didn't succeed, and You tried to change the
Versions this fails on field from 3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 to 3.3.3 3.4.0]
The patch applies to the 3.3 branch as well and
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 |3.3.3 3.4.0
Known to work||4.0.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
# no reasoning for the tag in the bug report
tags 288817 - sarge
Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
End of message, stopping
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-08
03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp'
in tail call
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 14:47, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
wrote:
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
03:55 ---
David's patch looks correct to me. We only need this on mainline, as the
precursor patch (PR 13158) is only on mainline. I will do a build and test and
then check it in if all goes well.
--
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-08 04:47 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
wilson at specifixinc dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| according to http://bugs.debian.org/286840 (if that's the
16 matches
Mail list logo