Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible to have various versions of gccco installed, though none of the packages use the alternative system but a couple of unrelated symlinks in /usr/bin. Thus, these symlinks get overwritten on every

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Falk Hueffner
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43: On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible to have various versions of gccco installed, though none of the packages use the alternative system but a couple of unrelated

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Falk Hueffner
Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:50:40: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43: Ok, what is then the reason to allow multiple versions of gcc if i'm not allowed to

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attila Kinali [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43: On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Symlinks in /usr/bin belong to dpkg; you have no business changing them.

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, how am i supposed to change the default compiler if i'm not allowed to change the symlinks ? No, changing $PATH doesn't work as all gcc binaries are installed in /usr/bin. ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Attila Kinali wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, how am i supposed to change the default compiler if i'm not allowed to change the symlinks ? No, changing $PATH doesn't work as all gcc binaries are installed in /usr/bin. ln -s

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:15:38 +0100 Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attila Kinali wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/local/bin/gcc LOL, this is a joke ? Right ? No. I still consider it to be one.

Processed: Re: Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9

2005-01-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 242916 277206 Bug#242916: [fixed in 3.4] ICE on invalid #define with -traditional Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9 Merged 242916 277206. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9

2005-01-07 Thread Falk Hueffner
merge 242916 277206 thanks Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.01.05 16:45:19: I tracked it down to a vsyscall.S file containing only the line #define __builtin_warning(x, ...) (1) and compiling it with gcc -traditional -o vsyscall.s vsyscall.S causes the segfault. Ah, then

Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa

2005-01-07 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:56:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: hmm, the network card of my A500 is currently broken :-( Lamont, please could you check, if you can reproduce this? Dann, does recompiling apt fix the problem? I re-upgrade the box, which has been up for 45 days hasn't had any

Bug#187564: [Bug rtl-optimization/10692] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl with -O2 -fPIC

2005-01-07 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2005-01-07 21:36 --- [tried to reopen the report, but didn't succeed, and You tried to change the Versions this fails on field from 3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 to 3.3.3 3.4.0] The patch applies to the 3.3 branch as well and

Bug#187564: [Bug rtl-optimization/10692] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl with -O2 -fPIC

2005-01-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 |3.3.3 3.4.0 Known to work||4.0.0

Processed: tagging 288817

2005-01-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 # no reasoning for the tag in the bug report tags 288817 - sarge Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge End of message, stopping

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-07 Thread wilson at specifixinc dot com
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-08 03:51 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 14:47, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-07 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 03:55 --- David's patch looks correct to me. We only need this on mainline, as the precursor patch (PR 13158) is only on mainline. I will do a build and test and then check it in if all goes well. --

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-07 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-01-08 04:47 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call wilson at specifixinc dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | according to http://bugs.debian.org/286840 (if that's the