My name is Julie :)
Most of the time I like to do something I've never done before.. so I decided
to have my first website featuring me (pics and videos). My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) Verify your age and connect to my webcam today
-)
Come I want to share my life
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:19:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing:
gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
Wish you could be better?
http://www.terima.net/ss/
Penis Growth Patches are here!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Falk Hueffner wrote:
Hi,
this seems to be the well-known exces precision problem of the i386,
so closing.
Hello,
I (mildly) protest the closing of this bug. The bug is not in fact
fixed -- just well-known. Even though it is due to a CPU issue
rather than a compiler problem, unoptimized
REPLICASONLINE - WE NEVER COMPROMISE ON QUALITY
Rolex replica is our speciality
We guarantee lowest prices and highest quality
We are the Direct manufacturers.
For top quality rolex watchs pleas visit:
http://www.ultimatetimepiece4u.net
eave mwk mailmen il [2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 309210 - moreinfo
Bug#309210: gcc-4.0 miscompile PARI/GP on x86
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 309210 - moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
tags 309210 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
how can this problem be reproduced?
Easily:
1) download the tarball mentionned in the bug report and untar it
2) do
CC=gcc-4.0 ./Configure
3) do
make bench
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Falk Hueffner wrote:
this seems to be the well-known exces precision problem of the
i386, so closing.
I (mildly) protest the closing of this bug. The bug is not in fact
fixed -- just well-known. Even though it is due to a CPU issue
rather than
4.0 CVS 20050522 on ia64-linux, binutils-2.15, glibc-2.3.5,
works with 3.3.6 and 3.4.4 releases
$ gcc -O2 -g -c writet1.i
writet1.c: In function 'load_enc':
writet1.c:348: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
writet1.c: In function 't1_open_fontfile':
writet1.c:1000:
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-05-23 16:48
---
Created an attachment (id=8951)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8951action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21721
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-05-23 16:49
---
Created an attachment (id=8952)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8952action=view)
assembler file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21721
--- You are receiving this mail
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.3.6 3.4.4
Known to work||4.0.1
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
Known to fail|3.3.6 3.4.4 |4.0.1
Known to work|4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-05-23 17:21 ---
Seems to be fixed in 4.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.4
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8.dsc
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8.diff.gz
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj6-common_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj-common_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj6-src_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to
tag 305690 + fixed-in-experimental
tag 308948 + fixed-in-experimental
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to an
upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 01:56:28
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 305690 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#305690: gcc-4.0: Please change the Build-Depends
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 308948 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#308948: gcc-4.0: Please add Ada support for the
Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:24:18 -0700
The other alternative is to touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
Sure, but in the mail you are specifically replying to I stated:
Also, /etc/disable_64_gcc is a workaround and should not be there
by default as it is now, especially on your
The other alternative is to touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:05:21PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:06:52 +0200
Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this bug has been open for quite some time as important. Can some
sparc people please comment on
You're right. Didn't get down that far. As far as I'm concerned, the
default 64-bit is the right thing. But it's hard to convince long time
users that a machine that is 99% 32-bit userspace, should compile 64-bit
binaries by default, when 99% of the time, those same people are going to
want
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:27:22PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote:
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg-buildpackage and get the same build
they got
package: gcc-3.4
New upstream version 3.4.4 fixes 163 bugs. List of problems fixed in
3.4.4 are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVEDresolution=FIXEDtarget_milestone=3.4.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
25 matches
Mail list logo
