Processing of gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.changes

2011-11-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5.dsc gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5.diff.gz gcc-4.6-source_4.6.2-5_all.deb libstdc++6-4.6-doc_4.6.2-5_all.deb gcc-4.6-locales_4.6.2-5_all.deb gcc-4.6-base_4.6.2-5_i386.deb libgcc1_4.6.2-5_i386.deb

gcc-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-11-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: cpp-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/cpp-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb fixincludes_4.6.2-5_i386.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/fixincludes_4.6.2-5_i386.deb g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-5_i386.deb to main/g/gcc-4.6/g++-4.6-multilib_4.6.2-5_i386.deb g++-4.6_4.6.2-5_i386.deb to

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Ben Hutchings writes (Increasing minimum 'i386' processor): The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Hutchings writes (Increasing minimum 'i386' processor): The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to have to replace it. Perhaps a better approach would be

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 22 novembre 2011, vers 18:28, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org disait : The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to

Bug#649615: gdc-4.4: Annoying multilib warning

2011-11-22 Thread Peter De Wachter
Package: gdc-4.4 Version: 1.063-4.4.6-7 Severity: important Any invocation of the gdc-4.4 compiler prints a multilib-relted warning: cc1d: warning: command line option -imultilib is valid for C/C++/Fortran/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for D This is rather annoying and hides useful compiler warnings.

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Ben Hutchings writes (Increasing minimum 'i386' processor): The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be

Bug#649615: gdc-4.4: Annoying multilib warning

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/22/2011 07:27 PM, Peter De Wachter wrote: Package: gdc-4.4 Version: 1.063-4.4.6-7 Severity: important Any invocation of the gdc-4.4 compiler prints a multilib-relted warning: cc1d: warning: command line option -imultilib is valid for C/C++/Fortran/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for D

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. I think it is time to increase the minimum

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/20/2011 01:08 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi! On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors and now require a minimum of a 486-class