Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago. Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the month old bugs still

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago. Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think the switch should

Results for 4.7.0 (Debian 4.7.0-8) testsuite on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Wed May 9 16:03:45 UTC 2012 (revision 187339) Target: mipsel-linux-gnu gcc version 4.7.0 (Debian 4.7.0-8) Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.

Bug#667544: fixed in 4.7, still broken in trunk

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.05.2012 01:39, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi! It looks like version 4.7.0-8 of g++-4.7 includes a fix for this one. On the other hand, gcc-snapshot 20120501-1 is still broken. It's likely the ICE has been already fixed upstream, though. Is there a trivial way to uupdate -snapshot? If

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago. Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The intent to get

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:42:21 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I am only aware of these usertags: debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508 do you known about a new rebuild? No, I've seen bugs being filed from watching -bugs-rc. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an alternative, just that it is highly problematic as the default at this point of

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.05.2012 21:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an alternative, just that it is

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones. There were

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote: gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low . * Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.

Processed: Re: Bug#670978: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: Error: symbol type gnu_unique_object is supported only by GNU targets

2012-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 670978 src:gcc-4.6 Bug #670978 [binutils] FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: Error: symbol type gnu_unique_object is supported only by GNU targets Bug reassigned from package 'binutils' to 'src:gcc-4.6'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: gcc-4.6: errors from -pedantic -Werror say [-Werror=edantic]

2012-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: Version: 20120501-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign 616634 gcc-snapshot 20120407-1 Bug #616634 [gcc-4.7] gcc-4.6: errors from -pedantic -Werror say [-Werror=edantic] Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.7' to