Re: Processed: gdc: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Bad value

2016-12-04 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 4 December 2016 at 10:15, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 3 December 2016 at 22:29, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 03.12.2016 22:13, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> On 03.12.2016 22:00, Matthias Klose wrote: reassign 846669 gdc-6 forcemerge 845377 846669

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/04/2016 06:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > >> So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and >> s-memory.ads? > > Yes. OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly.

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and > s-memory.ads? Yes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/04/2016 04:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > However, I'm by no means an Ada expert to be able to tell whether we still > need > Ada.Unchecked_Conversion anymore. I have glimpsed over PR48835 and I'm not > sure > whether this confirms this in any way. Ah, I assume you were talking

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/04/2016 02:38 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > >> @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary? > > I didn't say that. Ok, this was a misunderstanding then as you meant earlier that "this" is no

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary? I didn't say that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/04/2016 01:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Dropping ada-m68k.diff fixes this particular issue for me. > m68k-revert-pr45144.patch > is currently not applied because we have disabled Ada on m68k by adding it to > ada_no_cpus in debian/rules.defs because of #814221 [1]. Hmm, so I

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

2016-12-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Matthias! On 12/03/2016 11:56 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Adrian, I would appreciate if you could look at a package first before calling > for actions, and then ask a complete question. We also have the > m68k-revert-pr45144 patch in the build which apparently needs some decision. Dropping

Re: Processed: gdc: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: Bad value

2016-12-04 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 3 December 2016 at 22:29, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03.12.2016 22:13, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 03.12.2016 22:00, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> reassign 846669 gdc-6 >>> forcemerge 845377 846669 >>> thanks >>> >>> please see #845377. >>> >>> This build is configured with