* Niels Thykier:
> armel/armhf:
>
>
> * Undesirable to keep the hardware running beyond 2020. armhf VM
>support uncertain. (DSA)
>- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
Fedora is facing an issue running armhf under virtualization on arm64:
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 26 10:50:03 UTC 2018 (revision 262138)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target unix
=== libatomic Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests 5
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 26 10:50:03 UTC 2018 (revision 262138)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target unix
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests 5
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:gcc-6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #902293
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:gcc-6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
5 matches
Mail list logo